Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
Ah... so you don't want a Federal Nanny State, you are ok with limiting yourself to a more Local Tyranny.

Ever think that maybe you have an unhealthy interest in controlling your neighbors life?

334 posted on 11/09/2010 6:05:45 AM PST by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse

Au contraire, I have a healthy interest in preventing the mentally ill, with sexual fetishes, not be allowed to influence my life or the lives of other people.

It’s that simple.

As has been said a gazillion times, if they kept their nasty business private, no one would know or care.

But since that horse left the bard in the early 70s, we don’t live in that world any more. Time to bring back the privacy you so loftily prate about!

Oh, and this - do you think our country was Local Tyranny for the almost two centuries during which local and state laws against homosexual acts were on the books and even enforced? Were they Nanny Staters too? Was Jefferson a Nanny Stater because he was fine with outlawing sodomy?

Please anser the question.


360 posted on 11/09/2010 7:41:06 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson