For good reason. It isn't any of your damn business.
I don't WANT it to be any business of mine. A government, State or Federal, powerful enough to legislate such intimacies between consenting adults has WAY too much power.
How much more history do we need to experience before we figure out that powerful governments always abuse that power no matter how "noble" or "moral" their starting goals may be?
Yes it is when it's in the public square and degenerates are forcing acceptance of their deviancy.
How much more history do we need to experience
Tell it to Rome. Oh wait......you can't. They rotted from within and fell.
Have a nice day.
Oh, yes it is my d@mn business when it comes out of the bedroom and into the streets and gets flaunted in my face with demands that I not only have to accept it being done in public but that I accept it period.
The whole homosexual agenda stuff started with the line of *What is done in the bedroom is nobody else's business* but since that they they've made it everybody else's business.
When what they do goes beyond just them and WE have to live with the consequences of their behavior, it becomes our d@mn business.
It becomes our d@mn business because homosexuals are the #1 molesters of children.
It becomes our d@mn business when disease spread primarily through the gay community is running rampant through society.
It becomes our d@mn business when our taxes are paying for the extortionate health care of keeping alive someone who has contracted AIDS through that lifestyle.
The biggest lie going that the homosexual community puts forth is that what they do is nobody else's business because it doesn't affect them.
The unbelievable irony in all this is that when it comes to schools spying on kids through school issued laptops (Does the term Lower Merion ring any bells?) that the kids had no choice about accepting, you were there backing up the school 100%. It was all the parents fault for not keeping the school from spying on the kids, the school had every right to, yada, yada, yada.
And now here you're purporting to be some kind of anti-big-government advocate? You?
IIRC, you admitted to being an IT person who worked FOR a school district. Ironic that someone who's anti-big-government would be willing to earn their living off of it.