Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tublecane

hmmm.. I DID say “societal” controls, not specifically government.

Indeed, a community can “impose” its standards of behavior on individuals without any form of government (force) involved.

Shunning was/is an effective practice.


36 posted on 10/18/2010 9:51:08 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

“hmmm.. I DID say ‘societal’ controls, not specifically government”

Yes, you did. But you were talking about the workability of “libertarianism” (scare quotes in the original), which (as I pointed out in my response) is a political, not a social, ideology. There is a school out there that scorns all “societal” control, but it is not libertarianism. Though, as I indicated, some political libertarians—J.S. Mill, Max Stirner—succumbed to it. Such people are most commonly called “libertines.”

“Indeed, a community can ‘impose’ its standards of behavior on individuals without any form of government (force) involved.

Shunning was/is an effective practice.”

I agree.


46 posted on 10/18/2010 10:05:10 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson