Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MIchaelTArchangel

My original prediction last February was 80 House seats, 14 Senate. While my Senate number looks high now, I’m not sure that my House number was all that off base.


23 posted on 10/18/2010 12:51:37 PM PDT by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: rushmom

“My original prediction last February was 80 House seats, 14 Senate. While my Senate number looks high now, I’m not sure that my House number was all that off base.”

Realize that the Senate race started with 19 Democrats and 18 Republicans. For Republicans to gain 14 seats they would have to win 32 seats to 5 for the Democrats. I don’t think there’s ever been a party that dominated a Senate election that badly.

To understand how one-sided that would be, if Republicans won all three sets of Senate seats by the the same ratio, they’d win either 86 or 87 Senate seats.


27 posted on 10/18/2010 1:05:19 PM PDT by Moral Hazard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: rushmom
While my Senate number looks high now
You may end up closer to that than you think. Fiorina will beat Boxer, Rossi will beat Murray, Angle will beat Reid, McMahon will beat Blumenthal, Johnson over Feingold, Kirk over the mafioso, Buck over Bennet, Paul over Conway, Rubio over Crist/Meeks, Miller over Murkowski/whomever, Toomey over Sestak. This will be a wave. Any Pub within 3-5 points will win, and Pub within 7-9 will be close and might eke it out.
28 posted on 10/18/2010 1:06:44 PM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson