Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Battle for America 2010: What Are GOP Prospects for a Senate Takeover One Week Out?
Pajamas Media ^ | October 26, 2010 | Rich Baehr

Posted on 10/26/2010 5:43:28 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2010 5:43:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

...if Pajamas Media is still asking, then it’s probable.


2 posted on 10/26/2010 5:46:53 AM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’d say 48 or 49 and would’t be too surprised if we ended up with 47. I hate being pessimistic and will vote and do everything I can but we’re a week away from the election and the races are moving in the wrong direction or remain toss ups. If we were going to take the Senate, I would think we’d see races like WA and CA moving in the GOP direction. Instead, we have races like PA moving in the Dem direction and others remaining toss ups. Toss up = Dems can win by playing their tricks.


3 posted on 10/26/2010 5:48:42 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
. Instead, we have races like PA moving in the Dem direction and others remaining toss ups. Toss up = Dems can win by playing their tricks.

The latest polls show Toomey up by 8 points.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2614610/posts

4 posted on 10/26/2010 5:51:08 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’ve read that every time the House has flipped, so did the Senate. I haven’t researched that myself beyond having read it more than once, but is does seem logical. If someone goes into the booth to vote a Democrat out of the House, they are probably going to vote for a Republican Senator if there is one on the ballot.

I’ve noticed something interesting this cycle. Precious few campaign signs have party affiliation on them. If there is part affiliation, it is Republican. I can’t recall seeing a single sign with a Donkey on it.


5 posted on 10/26/2010 5:51:25 AM PDT by IamConservative (Our collective common sense; the only thing a 1.5GPF toilet ever flushed on the first pull.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This is a very good breakdown of where we stand senate-wise. I'm going to print it to see how close he comes to the facts on November 3rd.

It also demonstrates very clearly that this election is not "in the bag", and that conservatives have to fight and scrabble for every last possible vote.

Turnout is the key; it will be extremely interesting to see how those numbers look after November 2nd. Will conservatives have put their "vote where their mouth is"....or not?

6 posted on 10/26/2010 5:52:27 AM PDT by Logic n' Reason (You can roll a turd in powered sugar; that don't make it a jelly donut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

TEA Minus 7 Days and Counting.


7 posted on 10/26/2010 5:54:47 AM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

If half the people who post these horse race threads get out and vote, we will prevail.

Dims want you complacent or discouraged just as long as you stay home!


8 posted on 10/26/2010 5:55:09 AM PDT by Let's Roll (Stop ACORN destroying America! Cut off their federal funding!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

48 with a Senator Angle sounds better than 50 with Reid still in the Senate if you ask me.

I’ll stand by my prediction that it ends up 50/50.


9 posted on 10/26/2010 5:56:20 AM PDT by RockinRight (if the choice is between Crazy and Commie, I choose Crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative

The reason the Senate would stay Dem is high turnout in urban districts whose House district is Dem regardless. The high turnout in a particular inner-city district won’t change the balance in the House but could tip a statewide Senate seat.


10 posted on 10/26/2010 5:57:53 AM PDT by RockinRight (if the choice is between Crazy and Commie, I choose Crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

On 11/3, we’ll find out the answer to the question we have voiced thousands of times:

Oh, say does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave?


11 posted on 10/26/2010 5:58:02 AM PDT by updatedscreenname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I predict, when the dust is settled, the GOP will have a gain of 6. Well short of a takeover, but enough to dent the 0bama agenda significantly.


12 posted on 10/26/2010 5:58:42 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: updatedscreenname

Yep. We’re going to have a fairly clear idea of the future of this country by the morning of 3 Nov.


13 posted on 10/26/2010 6:00:34 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative

It’s the same way that Algore won the popular vote in 2000 but W won the EC.

The heavily GOP districts in the country are maybe 65/35 GOP to Dem, but the heavily Dem districts in some cities run as high as 85/15 Dem to GOP.


14 posted on 10/26/2010 6:00:34 AM PDT by RockinRight (if the choice is between Crazy and Commie, I choose Crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Senator Grassley was on local radio yesterday and he agrees the Rs will end up with about 48 seats.

BTW, this guy was stellar and I am proud to call him my senator--now Harkin is another story.

15 posted on 10/26/2010 6:03:18 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
BTW, this guy was stellar and I am proud to call him my senator--now Harkin is another story.

Why does Iowa continue to reelect both Grassley and Harkin to the Senate?

16 posted on 10/26/2010 6:41:18 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Beats me. Maybe it's because people are lazy and don't want to bother themselves with learning about issues so they just vote for the guy that is already in there.

FWIW, Grassley is more popular than Harkin. Grassley is untouchable but Harkin can be defeated.

I had the pleasure of walking with Grassley in a parade. It was wonderful. The people were thrilled to see him. He was getting applause, thumbs up, and hollering. He was smiling all the time and thanking the people. I know why he wins, he's a good man and he's likeable. He's one of us. He's a farmer and knows his roots. He's not an elite like Harkin.

17 posted on 10/26/2010 7:07:44 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
Urban inner-city districts is a euphemism for African-American voters to which we ought to add academic ghettos in university towns. But you are perfectly correct, statewide races are more difficult because of the implacable voting habits of the African-American population, confirming once again Nathan Bedford's maxim:

All politics in America is not local but ultimately racial.

Interestingly a new poll just out shows Barbara boxer down by four. That game is not yet over and I think the Republicans still have a 50-50 chance of taking the Senate.


18 posted on 10/26/2010 7:15:07 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
In this election cycle, the election map for the Senate is much more difficult than the House. CA, CT, DE, IL, WA and WI are solidly blue states. PA has gone Dem since 1988. It is amazing that we are doing as well as we are in these states. The fact that we are ahead in IL, PA and WI is amazing. We are tantalizingly close in WA and CA. We stand a good shot at taking Robert Byrd's seat. Meanwhile, we are going to bump off Harry Reid, the majority leader.

The bottom line is that two years ago the Dems gained a fillibuster proof majority in the Senate. They are on verge of becoming the minority party. Even if we fall one or two seats short, that is a MAJOR victory.

19 posted on 10/26/2010 7:15:21 AM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

It is worth mentioning that the Republican senators we are getting will be on the whole more conservative. Thus, it will be much easier to hold together enough votes to sustain fillibusters. Voinovich will be gone. Murkowski, gone. Collins, Snowe, Graham and McCain are about the only RINOs left. I would rather have a more ideologically pure GOP Senate and be in the minority than a mish mash of RINOs and in the majority.


20 posted on 10/26/2010 7:20:27 AM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson