I don’t necessarily disagree and I am voting my conscience on it today however I am stating that friends who are of many different faiths are not putting much into the basket because of the “Sand-Bag Theory” I explained before. I hope it passes but it would have been better if it would have started at a heartbeat instead of making the jump to conception. It is just simple maneuvering when you think about it.
Which would have been totally arbitrary, thereby destroying the principled basis for every moral, constitutional, legal and philosophical argument against abortion.
We choose not to use that word, for the simple reason that the enablers of the abortion holocaust in the medical profession have hijacked it, deceptively substituting what should be called "implantation" for "conception."
Opening the door to gruesome Mengele-like experimentation on little human beings at their earliest stages of growth.
So we say "creation," or "biological inception," etc.
It's exactly that kind of unprincipled "maneuvering" that has led to the utter failure of the old NRTL "pro-life" movement for 37 years.
Either they’re persons or they’re not.
If they are, even Blackmun, in the Roe vs. Wade majority opinion, admitted that they are protected by the clear imperative words of our Constitution.
If you think they’re not? Then you are in agreement with Blackmun. He and his colleagues dehumanized the child, and are directly responsible for more than fifty million barbaric killings.