I am not debating the evils of abortion but rather the likelihood of the passage of a particular bill. I think that an all or nothing approach was the wrong maneuvering and that a bill that more people could get on board with, like defining a person as someone with a heartbeat would have been the increment more suited to getting what we want out of 63. the problem with 63, regardless of how much we agree with what a person is, is that most people don’t and a smaller step with regards to a definition would have been better.... kinda like climbing Everest on day one.
It doesn’t work that way. When you give away the principle, death wins.
The lives of little babies are not something that can be sacrificed on the altar of political calculation.