Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fiorina concedes to Boxer
sacbee.com ^ | Nov. 3, 2010

Posted on 11/03/2010 11:15:35 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

Saying "the outcome is clear," GOP Senate candidate Carly Fiorina conceded defeat this morning to Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer.

Addressing reporters, Fiorina said she had called Boxer to express her congratulations. And she said it was time for Democrats and Republicans to set aside partisanship.

"I hope all will come together," she said, adding that members of Congress should "redouble their efforts to make sure that all people have a chance to live the American Dream.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2010midterms; barbaraboxer; boxer; ca2010; california; carlyfiorina; fiorina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: EDINVA
I'm sorry -- but did you hear any of Fiorina's "business" ideas? She is a big-government globalist. "Free market" was not in her repetoire. Instead, she wanted more government involvement, more handouts, more "incentives", more "economic zones", more investment in "green energy" and "green jobs" -- more of all the crap that is saddling the average business today. Sure, all of those things help her high tech buddies and venture capital friends -- but the average citizen gets screwed. But, since we're all suffering so much, she was more than ready to jump the aisle and push for more unemployment benefits, etc.

She would have been a good Senator -- kinda like Lincoln Chaffee or John McCain: sure to disappoint.

61 posted on 11/03/2010 9:09:39 PM PDT by calcowgirl (YES on PROP 23!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mr Inviso

Carly vowed to support the DREAM Act.
She fully supported the repeal of DADT.
She supported Obama’s unemployment excesses
She supported Obama’s new START nuclear weapons treaty.
She said she wanted to fix the global warming cap and trade nonsense — not denounce it.
She ran ad after ad touting how she would cross her party...


62 posted on 11/03/2010 9:20:18 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Was it Meg or Fiorina that first spoke out against the Tea Party rallies?

I swear I remember it being Fiorina and it was before she jumped on their bandwagon.

But....I still would have taken her over Boxer. If nothing else than to slap that smug expression off Boxer's face!

63 posted on 11/03/2010 9:23:43 PM PDT by CAluvdubya ("May we always be happy & may our enemies always know it!"-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

I read a couple post-mortems today. They said that she didn’t want to interact with the media, wasn’t comfortable getting out and talking with people, etc. So... they kept her sheltered. The woman can’t ride around on her jet and cook up her ideas in isolation — I don’t think she has any idea of what the average citizen thinks about politicians or Sacramento. She never followed public policy or any of California’s long history - she couldn’t even be bothered to vote. She came across as totally clueless on issues.

She irked me because all she kept saying was “I have a plan” or “I know how to solve those problems” but NEVER said HOW. I read through her 50 page glossy brochure calling for a “NEW” California. It was void of any real strategy on how to tackle the office of governor. It was a bunch of gibberish. When you take all that with her liberal record ($ to Enviro defense, acceptance of Global Warming BS, fan of Van Jones, wanting to hand out more green energy $ to her buddies in the silicon valley, to spend $50 billion on public water projects and sell the ownership interests to her financial backers, etc. etc. etc — she became a hugely dislikable and dangerous character).

I tried to bite my tongue for months. I slipped a few times and posted less than flattering comments. But honestly - the people that come on here and say she was a good candidate or ran an excellent campaign are selling the same old snake oil.

Did you see Nehring’s comments yesterday quoted in the SF Chron? He needs to look in a mirror - he and Petey are the has-beens and relics that need to be retired.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=76117#ixzz14H6zJ000

“I hope these two has-beens [Brown and Boxer] are at least gracious enough to take time today and thank those they’ve managed to sucker into supporting their failed policies during the last four decades. It’s important they thank them today, because after tomorrow, nobody’s going to be interested in anything those two relics have to say,” Nehring said.


64 posted on 11/03/2010 9:30:43 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

Meg said less than flattering things about the Tea Party

Fiorina said something like — I’ll represent everyone and the Tea Party has some legitimate points.
She may have said something earlier than that — I don’t know.

I voted for both of them - but it took some serious nose holding.


65 posted on 11/03/2010 9:33:16 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
San Diego county went R after we got rid of Nehring! And Pete Wilson is the reason we have Ahnold and Whitman and the like.

Yeah, the minute I heard that our candidate hadn't voted for 20 years or 10 years or whatever, I knew we were screwed. How does one overcome not taking an interest in their own state's gov. then try to govern it! Crazy!

66 posted on 11/03/2010 9:36:42 PM PDT by CAluvdubya ("May we always be happy & may our enemies always know it!"-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

Well, while I’m no longer tongue biting, did you ever check out our(R) SOS candidate?
The Democrat from Florida — also a non-voter — recruited by Rove?


67 posted on 11/03/2010 9:57:57 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
California politics is decided in the metro areas

To be precise it's decided by L.A. & the Bay Area.

68 posted on 11/04/2010 1:43:53 AM PDT by newzjunkey (A banner night for GOP nationwide & CAGOP lose everything by 10%?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey; BigSkyFreeper
California politics is decided in the metro areas

To be precise it's decided by L.A. & the Bay Area.

California is like a big watermelon: lots of red on the inside, thin blue rind on the outside.

69 posted on 11/04/2010 1:47:12 AM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson