Sure don't sound like one to me. And since you are in DC, keep your nose out of California business dude and I won't have to poke it again. If you want more insults, keep up the insulting behavior.
Sure don't sound like one to me. And since you are in DC, keep your nose out of California business dude and I won't have to poke it again. If you want more insults, keep up the insulting behavior.
i'm not a "dude", and who are you to tell me what to stay out of? and i don't care what i don't sound like to you. this is a free speech forum. i don't post a lot, but when i do, i don't say anything that's out of line or distasteful. let the moderators be the judge of that.
You’re obviously against free speech and obviously a RINO lover. Might as well be a democrat.
Oh and I am in CA and have my nose all up in its business.
Fiorina and Whitman were clueless. I’m in their own party and I didn’t even want to vote for them.
Did either of them mention gun control once?
Did either of them mention the health care bill once?
Did either of them mention the dynamics of California, how the Legislature there has been run by Democrats for the last fifty years?
Did one of them promise to get tough on illegal immigration actually addressing using the National Guard on the border? Well yes, and then when she was nominated she met with Spanish only groups explaining how she didn’t like California props like 187, or Arizona’s most recent bill to address illegal immigration.
Did either of these women address that California was the 5th economic power in the world in 2000, and today it’s eighth?
I can’t fathom how you can spend between $145 and $160 million and miss so much of Jerry Brown’s record, but Whitman did.
Both these women slung mud, but it was mud that was sterilized. It wasn’t the dirty globs of stuff that would destroy the opposition of the caliber the opposition uses on Republicans.
I found myself countless times watching these two women air campaign spots thinking they were sadly misguided.
Firoina aired some spots that showed her face up close. When she talked her mouth screwed up. It just wasn’t a flattering view of her. Who coached this woman? Whitman did the same thing. Here’s my face up close. Hell, I didn’t want to see that face at a distance. Neither of these women are attractive. I don’t generally care, but there’s some things you just don’t do if you’re a below average looking person. Using the last lense before a fish-eye just doesn’t cut it.
There are ways of going negative that sound factual, and there are ways of going negative that just sound juvenile, not effective at all.
Then you get to the realization that neither of these women found anything wrong with McCain, that would prevent them from hitching their wagon to him.
I saw Fiorina as another potential sock puppet for McCain to manipulate in the Senate.
In 2012, I hope we pick some folks who actually did have some connections to actual Conservatism before they decided to run for office.
Evidently picking someone who hasn’t even bothered to vote in the last 28 years just didn’t appeal to people. And another person who sent 30,000 jobs overseas didn’t either.
Go figure.
Those two women were non-starters. We tried to tell all the brilliant voters that nominated them.
Well, here we are...
Will anyone listen in 2012? I doubt it. They’ll just continue to nominate flashy losers and blame everyone but themselves when the stuff hits the fan.
I don’t know one Conservative that hasn’t voted for the last 28 years. Does anyone on the forum?