Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Truth about George W. Bush's "deficit"
private email | unknown | unknown

Posted on 11/04/2010 2:34:46 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: afraidfortherepublic
I don't have a source for this...

Total national debt

YES,THEY DID.

41 posted on 11/04/2010 3:53:49 PM PDT by true believer forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep
They article states that Dodd and Frank took over financial committees in 2007 and we know those committees passed legislation that directed banks to loan to customers who were not credit worthy. Who signed that legislation?
42 posted on 11/04/2010 4:01:57 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Probably my graph from my editorial about this issue:

Note that I didn't go back past 1994 because it was a moot point - pretty much Democrat control for 50 years.

When the GOP controls Congress, regardless of who's the President, deficits fall. The power of the purse lies with Congress, not the President. And this graph pretty much proves the point. Having split control of Congress is bad (not as bad as 100% control by the Democrats); we need to focus on taking back the Senate and keeping the House in 2012, rather than bumping off Obama (that would be nice, however). It's better for the nation to get control of Congress, than just one chamber and the Presidency.

43 posted on 11/04/2010 4:06:13 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Ping


44 posted on 11/04/2010 4:09:06 PM PDT by carjic (Laid off since Dec 08...HELP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Frank was the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee in 2003 and opposed the Bush administration proposal, in response to accounting scandals, for transferring oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from Congress and the Department of Housing and Urban Development to a new agency that would be created within the Treasury Department.

Even Clinton said that while he was president that HE and Republicans tried to get oversight for Fannie and Freddie but Democrats opposed it.


45 posted on 11/04/2010 4:19:59 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Not at all true.

Bush put payback provisions in tarp 1. The payback included interests.

That is decidedly fiscally conservative.

On Jan 2007 the deficit was falling rapidly and projected to reach zero in 2009.

Democrats in conger began in 2007 to reverse that and cause the second great depression.

Those are the facts.


46 posted on 11/04/2010 5:34:09 PM PDT by lonestar67 (I remember when unemployment was 4.7 percent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

THIS is what we had in ‘06 when Republicans held both houses of congress and the WH, and dim-0s were running for control of congress promising “CHANGE.” How’re yall liking the “CHANGE?”

2006 unemployment #s
4.7...jan.
4.8...feb.
4.7...march
4.7...april
4.7...may
4.6...june
4.7...july
4.7...aug.
4.5...sep.
4.4...oct.
4.5...nov.
4.4...dec.

________________________________________http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&series_id=LNS14000000

When Republicans had both houses and the WH.........................http://www.icmarc.org/xp/rc/marketview/ ... oduct.html

The 1st quarter of ‘06 saw 4.8% growth in GDP. Then came dimos running for control of congress promising “CHANGE.” They won, and after 2 years in power, things HAVE “CHANGED” GDP growth dropped to negative 6%. Happy with your “CHANGE?”

12,600 12,621.77 January 24, 2007
DOW open and close
Deficit in january ‘07, 1.2%


47 posted on 11/04/2010 5:36:11 PM PDT by weezel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

NOT ONE of Reagans budgets got past tip o’neill. DOA, he called them. They were replaced with budgets written by dim-0s, producing the deficits that dim-0s then blamed on Reagan.

Same thing with klinton. Not one of his budgets went thru, from ‘95 on and not one was even balanced, let alone surplus producing. The new Governor elect of Ohio wrote the budget that produced the PROJECTED surplus.


48 posted on 11/04/2010 5:40:33 PM PDT by weezel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

While it’s true the Dems took over in 2007, GHWB did give us tax cuts without spending cuts for six years before that.


49 posted on 11/04/2010 6:12:09 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Bookmark


50 posted on 11/04/2010 6:18:07 PM PDT by AlligatorEyes (Iactura paucourm serva multos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

Both the Democrats and Bush were on board with loosening lending practices. Here are some excerpts from a Bush speech in Atlanta.

“And what we’ve got to do is to figure out how to make sure these stories are repeated over and over and over again in America. Three-quarters of White America owns their homes. Less than 50 percent of African Americans are part of the home-ownership in America, and less than 50 percent of the Hispanics who live here in this country own their home. And that has got to change for the good of the country; it just does.”

“And so that’s why I propose and urge Congress to fully fund the American Dream Downpayment Fund. This will use money, taxpayers’ money, to help a qualified low-income buyer make a downpayment, and that’s important.”

“One of the barriers to homeownership is the inability to make a downpayment. And if one of the goals is to increase home-ownership, it makes sense to help people pay that downpayment. We believe that the amount of money in our budget, fully approved by Congress, will help 40,000 families every year realize the dream of owning a home. “

“And we want to fully implement the Section 8 housing program, homeownership program. The program will provide vouchers that first-time home buyers can use to help pay their mortgage or apply to their downpayment.”

“That’s why I’ve challenged the industry leaders all across the country to get after it for this goal, to stay focused, to make sure that we achieve a more secure America by achieving the goal of 5 1/2 million new minority homeowners. I call it America’s homeownership challenge.”

“And let me talk about some of the progress which we have made to date, as an example for others to follow. First of all, Government-sponsored corporations that help create our mortgage system—I introduced two of the leaders here today; they call those people Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—as well as the Federal Home Loan Banks will increase their commitment to minority markets by more than $440 billion. I want to thank Leland and Franklin for that commitment. It’s a commitment that conforms to their charters as well and also conforms to their hearts. This means they will purchase more loans made by banks to African Americans, Hispanics, and other minorities, which will encourage homeownership.”

George W. Bush

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=62687


51 posted on 11/04/2010 6:29:04 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MontaniSemperLiberi

Yes, and a healthy enough economy to allow falling deficits as long as the Republicans controlled Congress. So I don’t see that you have a point.


52 posted on 11/04/2010 7:06:02 PM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

You know what’s really neat about a healthy economy (which is what Bush + Republican Congress gave us. You could cut taxes, increase spending AND reduce the deficit. Amazing, isn’t it? But quite true, and a matter of historical record.


53 posted on 11/04/2010 7:08:22 PM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

You know what’s really neat about a healthy economy (which is what Bush + Republican Congress gave us. You could cut taxes, increase spending AND reduce the deficit. Amazing, isn’t it? But quite true, and a matter of historical record.


54 posted on 11/04/2010 7:08:37 PM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties

“You know what’s really neat about a healthy economy (which is what Bush + Republican Congress gave us. You could cut taxes, increase spending..”

So, it is your view that $440 billion of Socialism is acceptable if the economy is healthy?

“they call those people Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—as well as the Federal Home Loan Banks will increase their commitment to minority markets by more than $440 billion.”


55 posted on 11/04/2010 7:14:10 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Oh, come on. Don’t waste my time. Even you know the $440B was due to the Congressional ‘Rats.


56 posted on 11/04/2010 7:16:35 PM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

Bookmark this thread. It is an excellent resource.....

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2451468/posts


57 posted on 11/04/2010 7:18:49 PM PDT by csmusaret (Tax revenue increased 39% from2002 to 2007 as a result of the Bush tax cuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties

If that is the case, why did he say “I Propose.. and urge Congress to Fully Fund?”

“And so that’s why I propose and urge Congress to fully fund the American Dream Downpayment Fund. This will use money, taxpayers’ money, to help a qualified low-income buyer make a downpayment, and that’s important.”


58 posted on 11/04/2010 7:21:01 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

59 posted on 11/04/2010 7:26:23 PM PDT by csmusaret (Tax revenue increased 39% from2002 to 2007 as a result of the Bush tax cuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties

MYTH: The Bush tax cuts caused the deficit. FACT: In 2002, tax revenues were $1.85 trillion. In 2007, revenues were $2.57 trillion — a 39 percent INCREASE.


60 posted on 11/04/2010 7:28:40 PM PDT by csmusaret (Tax revenue increased 39% from2002 to 2007 as a result of the Bush tax cuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson