Posted on 11/13/2010 1:42:55 PM PST by FARS
What really got me thinking was the complete lack of any velocity reference, and the clear fact that the entire contrail/missile smoke track was completely illuminated by the sun, where ground level in the area was clearly in the dark by then.
Then to add to this, the missile exhaust "flame" is a pallid orange, not the brilliant white to yellow anyone that has seen a launch knows it to be. Curiously (or not) the "flame" is exactly the same color as the clouds being illuminated by the sun.
Took a day or so to think through, but it is not what so many want to believe..........
Kwajelein Atoll is the usual target in the Pacific Missile Test Range.
That'd take a ginormous submarine to tote around.
What you have to remember is the wide part is furthest away. The smaller part is coming toward the camera.
Too many people fail to understand that the ORIGINAL SCENE is three dimensional, but this picture isn't.
So there was a launch from the Pacific then the next day the Atlantic, which way did they go? Any links? thanks
Lots of folks saying
Our defenses would pick them up....WRONG
Our defenses can be bypassed by several means, technological advances, espionage, treason.
Its an airplane.....and if its not? Well?
With obambi in the White House ...better safe than sorry is the way to go, especially so since the last two years we have already been very very sorry.
Do not have the original links. Atlantic launch went West over New York. Pacific launch went north-east.
While the disabled Carnival cruise ship blamed it on a fire, is it too much a conspiracy theory to consider the real reason for everything electronic on board becoming useless on a Chinese EMP to underline to Obama what the EMP can do were they to deploy it over the USA in a multiple warhead submarine missile launch?
As apparantly the implicit Chinese threat appears to be
Ouch... that’s good research.
We’ve been advertizing our weaknesses to China for a long time, allowing them to attend our naval exercizes. [Thanks Clinton.]
So, I assume that the “plane”’s flight records a public now? Passengers interviewed yet of that “flight”? Pilots interviewed? Missile conspiracy theory wrapped in tinfoil now, right? I doubt it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2636217/posts?page=119#119
to be new?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2636217/posts
suggests a cover-up of potential secret missile testing in the area
So, if you are going to fire a secret missile, why do it off the coast of a city with population of 4 million people?
Here is a good thread. Lots of posts but some good anti-missile info.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2630752/posts?q=1&;page=551
I posted my #119 less than 18 hours ago, That was its first publication -- ever -- anywhere -- and it is all original material of my own creation. And it is all based on sound scientific principles.
What more do you want?
I thought you meant the WND article. I was being called by Mrs. RWA was calling me to cook my part of our meal. I rushed off a response before I fully understood and didn't catch that you were talking about your #119. As I started munching, it hit me that I messed up.
Yes, that is some cool stuff. You have done a lot of work on this. Thanks to you and the others for hanging in their and cranking out some good stuff. The other side can't dispute a lot of it so they ignore it.
Still, some people don't have a clue about what different perspectives can do to your brain, and will continue to believe what they THINK they see.
Sorry.
See my post #312.
~~~~~~~~
As a visually-oriented individual, this has been a real revelation: that there are many people who look at things and simply see very little of what is there -- and comprehend even less. Sort of how I am with text-delivered information...
But the big surprise was how many folks feel driven to see something evil and political in something I see as merely a common physical event that had just been brought to our attention in a deceptive fashion. The vehemence to which they seem driven amazes me -- and in a way, is distressing. I guess I'm just not "wired" to understand how folks can put so much personal and emotional commitment into a misinterpretation of something so ordinary...
But the truly distressing thing is their willingness to attribute evil motives to someone like me -- who is just trying to make sense of the event and working hard to try to convey what I see in graphic form. It's almost like we live in different worlds...
50 years! Wow, congrats. I got started a bit late so I’m only coming up on 33 years early next year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.