Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn
So does that mean their version of the Declaration of Independence includes the right to liberty and the perfuit of buggery, but not life?

I think you misunderstood this. They are not arguing for rights, they are against wasting time on crap that doesn't need committee time.

You are not going to change Roe v. Wade by getting into a snit every time you think you've been insulted.

And, BTW, nobody calls the shots for the tea party movement so you can all ignore whatever you want to and move on to something else.

Issa should be asking why Holder is a racist, not why he kills babies and kisses drag queens.

63 posted on 11/14/2010 4:49:00 PM PST by brucebrucebruceoftheforest (George got jungle rot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: brucebrucebruceoftheforest

Thank you for contributing some common sense to a thread that is sorely lacking it.


74 posted on 11/14/2010 4:55:40 PM PST by counterpunch ("Some election nights are more fun than others" - Baraq Hussein 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: brucebrucebruceoftheforest; kristinn
I think you misunderstood this. They are not arguing for rights, they are against wasting time on crap that doesn't need committee time. You are not going to change Roe v. Wade by getting into a snit every time you think you've been insulted.

Just so you know...I am sure Kristinn understands the Tea Party, and he doesn't do "snits".
76 posted on 11/14/2010 4:57:01 PM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: brucebrucebruceoftheforest

FU, troll!!


80 posted on 11/14/2010 4:58:43 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: brucebrucebruceoftheforest
I think you misunderstood this. They are not arguing for rights, they are against wasting time on crap that doesn't need committee time.

At first I agreed with you. I thought this made a lot of sense.

After reading many comments I am thinking that these guys are attempting to stave off any action by the GOP to write a marriage bill or enact any of what we would consider conservative social issues.

The truth is, I am still on the fence as to what they are trying to do but I can see the meaning from both sides.

81 posted on 11/14/2010 4:59:36 PM PST by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: brucebrucebruceoftheforest; kristinn; Jim Robinson; little jeremiah; metmom; xzins; P-Marlowe; ...
I think you misunderstood this. They are not arguing for rights, they are against wasting time on crap that doesn't need committee time.

WRONG, they are trying to obliterate the right to life and replace it with the right to kill and sodomize.

You are not going to change Roe v. Wade by getting into a snit every time you think you've been insulted.

That sounds just like what the Whigs were saying about slavery.

And, BTW, nobody calls the shots for the tea party movement so you can all ignore whatever you want to and move on to something else.

The Tea Party movement will find itself as obsolete and insignificant as the 1994 Contract with America if they marginalize social conservatives.

Issa should be asking why Holder is a racist, not why he kills babies and kisses drag queens.

Because racism is more important than the fact that a baby is murdered every 24 seconds?

83 posted on 11/14/2010 5:02:23 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson