I have listened to a lot of apologists for her resignation, but have not found the explanations persuasive enough, from the standpoint of a non-idealogy driven independent voter.
A simpler way of understanding it is by looking backwards at it from the present. Would you rather have had Gov.Palin waste 18 months as a stalemated executive in Alaska or would you rather that she played the role she did in the 2010 elections and why is it that the people complaining about her resigning are the same ones that never wanted her as governor in the first place? This view also credits Gov. Palin with the degree of political insight that she has proven to possess.
“This first way of looking at the resignation is probably more complex than most people will take the time to consider.”
That is my point.
“A simpler way of understanding it is by looking backwards at it from the present. Would you rather have had Gov.Palin waste 18 months as a stalemated executive in Alaska or would you rather that she played the role she did in the 2010 elections”
Certainly those who would vote for her in a primary and general would agree she did the smart thing.
“and why is it that the people complaining about her resigning are the same ones that never wanted her as governor in the first place?”
I have seen comments by conservatives who would want her as governor, but oppose the resignation.
“This view also credits Gov. Palin with the degree of political insight that she has proven to possess.”
I agree the results, both her financial wellbeing, and political endorsements, are a strong reflection of her insight.
The remaining question is how it plays with the voters between the 40 yard lines—those any candidate must have to win.
Her unfavorables remain high, indicating she could win the primary, but perhaps not the general.