And, of course, you actually believe the reports issued by companies that have cleared these machines so the profiteers can make mega bucks ________ ?
Did you check all the reports on my links _______ ? I know the answer to that question. Do not bother to reply.
I will just keep taking the train. In about two years the scanner companies will be buried in litigation over harmful effects from scanners. BIG SIS will be run out of DC on a rail and the profiteers may be locked behind bars.
My point was, you get more radiation from flying than from the machines. I provided references.
Do you have a reference that shows that the scanners give you more radiation than the 200 microR per hour minimum from flight?
Do you have a reference showing how much radiation the scanners put out?
I think if you cut n paste the whole line, you can see the BIER VII report. I can’t get that link to post properly.
Yes, take the train. At ground level background radiation is around 20 microREM, depending of course on just where you are, the altitude and ground composition being the most important factors. You’ll get less radiation at ground level.
“Did you check all the reports on my links _______ ?”
From your links:
Nov 15, 2010 ... The short answer is that the radiation risk from the TSA scanners is minimal for a member of the general flying public. ...
There are quite a few links to look at from your Google search, and oddly they are the same ones I got when I did the same search! lol
My point was, you get more radiation from flying than from the scanners.