Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TSA-Sexual Assault (read what the "mommy blogger" had to endure)
Our Little Chatterboxes Blog ^ | 11/16/10 | Erin

Posted on 11/18/2010 8:45:47 AM PST by skyman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-191 next last
To: RobRoy
I worry that we've gotten beyond the dinner roll: Podesta: Obama Can Use ‘Armed Forces’ to Push Progressive Agenda
141 posted on 11/18/2010 10:26:46 AM PST by MizSterious ("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Peter from Rutland

I think this happened when one of the first days when no one knew completley what was happening, even the TSA


142 posted on 11/18/2010 10:26:46 AM PST by skyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde
You cannot tell me that revenge racism does not play a part.

You know I think you stumbled on the truth here. We all know these new invasive measures came straight from Obama himself. We also know that Obama is a racist.

If you read the book "The Roots of Obama's Rage" you will discover that Obama has an anti-colonialist mentality rather than a love for the American people. He actually does hate anyone white and wants to see us all humiliated.

Think back in time here a bit. How were slaves treated on the public auction block? Stripped naked? Yep. Groped? Yep. And on and on it goes. I think Rush is right. These new patdowns are Obama acting out his rage on the electorate. He's also venting his racism making Americans endure what slaves had to endure in the past and he thinks its payback time.

I think you've nailed it big time.

143 posted on 11/18/2010 10:28:42 AM PST by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Never on my watch
Then they have just told the terrorist muzzies to use children as their weapons delivery system.

They modified their policies in response to outrage by parents, but, yes, there is that possibility. If they think parents of 13 year olds won't also be outraged, should they be molested, they are idiots.
144 posted on 11/18/2010 10:29:52 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

>>I worry that we’ve gotten beyond the dinner roll:<<

I don’t. I KNOW we’ve gotten WAY beyond the dinner roll. It’s why I bought my farm in central Kentucky.

The times they are a changin’. You can see it all around you.


145 posted on 11/18/2010 10:33:44 AM PST by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

Absolutely. I have several daughters over 18 years old. Do the airlines think that I am going to PAY good money for the opportunity to have them groped? Not hardly. You don’t stop being a parent when they hit 18, either.


146 posted on 11/18/2010 10:34:19 AM PST by Zarro (Hands off Our Junk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Chuzzlewit
they touched her privy parts?

If the Bill of Rights doesn't protect women from having their privates legally groped by government "security" creeps, it's not worth the paper it's printed on.
147 posted on 11/18/2010 10:34:19 AM PST by Antoninus (Fair warning: If Romney's the GOP nominee in 2012, I'm looking for a new party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
The mommy blogger didn’t say they touched her private parts glove to skin. It was through her clothes. Is that fine with you? For some thug to handle your privates through your clothes?? It isn’t fine with normal human beings

I've already posted I'm against these pat downs. Even Israel does not use them.

148 posted on 11/18/2010 10:37:16 AM PST by hoyt-clagwell (5:00 AM Gym Crew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

TSA’s new motto; “You con’t get on, Until wew get off.”


149 posted on 11/18/2010 10:37:55 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chuzzlewit

It sounds like the liberals got to you. Be a good little sheep and follow big government.


150 posted on 11/18/2010 10:39:36 AM PST by Sarajevo (You're jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Zarro

Agreed.


151 posted on 11/18/2010 10:43:40 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Getting back to the point of my post -- yes, lines move slow now. Just think how much slower they will move if you tried to run an airport the way the Israelis run Ben Gurion. You would have to be at the airport 6 to 8 hours (again my opinion) just to make your flight.

As for the rest of your post. Good soapbox preaching. I don't disagree.

152 posted on 11/18/2010 10:46:08 AM PST by carton253 (Ask me about The Stainless Banner - a free e-zine dedicated to the armies of the Confederacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

No kidding. My teenage daughters are not flying ANYWHERE until this nonsense backs off. I’m afraid I’d be making one serious scene. The whole idea is just gross.


153 posted on 11/18/2010 10:46:08 AM PST by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: hoyt-clagwell

I didn’t see your previous comment. All I saw was your comment that this story is exaggeration or something.

They should profile Muslims and leave everything else alone.

The purpose of this charade has nothing to do with national security. Nothing at all.


154 posted on 11/18/2010 10:46:44 AM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

My daughters are 10 and 13. We are flying to Orlando in December.

They will both wear sanitary pads and I’m seriously considering hijabs for all of us.


155 posted on 11/18/2010 10:51:06 AM PST by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: hoyt-clagwell
Really no different than sitting in a chair that hundreds have sat in before you.

Perhaps you're unaware, but bedbugs, pubic lice and bedbugs are all MOBILE. They can and do walk about thereby spreading without there being any direct contact with the carrier.

I took a buddy to a clinic once, and *I* ended up with crabs, even though I hadn't been up close and personal with anyone for months before the visit, nor before the little boogers showed up.

Here's a clue: parasitic insects are usually quite mobile in order to get to a host.

156 posted on 11/18/2010 11:02:15 AM PST by Don W (I keep some folks' numbers in my 'phone just so I know NOT to answer when they call...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Our gov’t should never expose them to the possibility of being pawed in any fashion by an “official” for the “priviledge” of flying. obama should be asked by a reporter (with full detail of what occurs to these children) how he would “feel” if this happened to his daughter(s). As a father, he should be ashamed. (I know, I know, it’s obama - he doesn’t understand shame.)


157 posted on 11/18/2010 11:03:04 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: conservativegramma; Albion Wilde
You cannot tell me that revenge racism does not play a part.

Hmmm... Just went through 30 pages of google images and could not find a single black getting patted down.

158 posted on 11/18/2010 11:03:16 AM PST by houeto ("You know, I actually believe my own bullsh_t," --- BHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Theo
Hm. I looked up 18 U.S. Code Section 2244 and didn’t find that definition. Do you have a reference?

Maybe this will help.

http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/18C109A.txt

Scroll down look under 18 USC Sec. 2246

Definitions for chapter

3) the term "sexual contact" means the intentional touching, either directly or through the clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person;

The code is 2244 but the definition is found in 2246 implemented 2/1/2010.

159 posted on 11/18/2010 11:07:32 AM PST by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

I fully agree with you.
I am praying that the Thanksgiving weekend, with the opt out, brings so much hell upon these people that the “Pat downs” will stop before we go.

I have no problem with the scanners.


160 posted on 11/18/2010 11:12:14 AM PST by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson