One half of it is accurate, but only because "Ulsterman" is rather obviously weaving his own inventions around other news reports, without of course acknowledging the later, or distinguishing between the two.
Notice you NEVER get anything genuinely new or definitive or confirmable out of Ulsterman. It's all hints never spelled out, riddles never solved, and promises of more to follow never fulfilled.
No, I obviously can't absolutely prove Ulsterman doesn't have some (inexplicably coy) "inside source," but to me the game he's playing with his readers is pretty transparent. I don't understand how anyone retains any patience with b.s. like this which never pays off.
I agree. He’s so coy, it’s more like he’s deliberately setting out bait to see if any looney-type public Republican will bite. Then when it’s all exposed as a “joke” , whoever on the right who went for it would be discredited.
well at least it isn’t as trashy as some of the stuff one could watch on tv. Lol
“One half of it is accurate, but only because “Ulsterman” is rather obviously weaving his own inventions around other news reports, without of course acknowledging the later, or distinguishing between the two”
Yes, his reports are suspect. UM posted and article while BO was in Asia, quoting BO, (cannot recall the content). A google net and news search only produced on hit, some blog out SC.
Beware.
Sure were a lot of people who watched "LOST".