Why dont you read the article?
And while you’re at it, why don’t you show me how Janetalia has the right to grab our genitals?
I did read the article, and the authors contention is absolutely laughable. While the right to interstate travel is a right, there is nothing anywhere which States that one has a right to travel by “a means of their choice.”
Under that logic, I suppose if I decide that I have a right to travel via a G5, then I have some Constitutional right to do so? Really now?
This idiot makes the juvenile assumption that a right to travel is synonymous with a specific mode of travel. They are not. One is not the other. One has the freedom to enter or leave a State under the P or I clause of Article IV. However, there is absolutely no Constitutional guarantee to any specific mode of travel. If you want to pretend there is one, you are no better than the judicial activists who made up a “right to abortion” whole-cloth.
This is what happens when you get a libertine with no legal training trying to quote things completely out of his field of expertise.