Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't Run Sarah!
The Daily Beast ^

Posted on 11/25/2010 9:10:56 AM PST by roses of sharon

I spent only a few hours with the former governor, helping to prepare her for the vice presidential debate in October 2008. And during that brief window, I saw Palin at one of her most vulnerable moments, when any result other than a complete train wreck seemed impossible. And yet I also saw a determined woman buckle down, recover her confidence and then storm the national stage where she more than held her own against a seven-term senator.

Did she face some tough slogging to reach her remarkable perch? Sure, you betcha. I admire her tenacity, her verve, her moxie, and her pluck. As she releases what’s sure to be another bestseller, America by Heart, I think it’s phenomenal how Palin has been able to leverage her moment in the spotlight. I marvel at her masterful manipulation of the media, and her ability to redirect the national debate with merely a tweet. Most of all, I like the way she defies conventional wisdom and does things her own way: She doesn’t retreat, she reloads. And without Palin and the Tea Party backing Republican candidates, I doubt the crimson tide would have risen so high Nov. 2.

Palin’s appeal completely befuddles metro-intellectuals. They scoff at her “experience,” holding the one-time city manager, mayor, oil and gas commission chair, governor, and vice presidential nominee to a different standard than candidate Obama. A marathon runner, mother of five, and grandmother to one, she has no qualms about smacking a slimy halibut—or an oil and gas company—upside the head. And don’t be fooled, underneath that “prom hair” is a brilliant populist.

Yet I find myself continually goaded into denigrating her, saying things like “she’s reached her sell-by date,” “her stock is going down,” and “if she’s smart, she won’t run for president.” And I was going to go on TV recently and say, “It’s rare you hear quantitative easing and Sarah Palin in the same sentence,” until I realized that she did a hell of a lot better job explaining the complex concept than I could.

Though she is rightfully suspicious of advice from outside Team Palin, and she certainly doesn't care what I think, it is my strong opinion that she should not run. Not just because I don’t agree with her positions or her politics, but because the coming political fight is about more than the future of Sarah Palin. It’s about the future of the country.

All the fun, the money, the power will only be diminished if she runs. Because I don’t care how you cut it, in the end she will lose.

President Obama’s approval rating is now just 39 percent, and he is statistically tied in a direct matchup with Palin according to a new Zogby poll. And according to Quinnipiac, American voters believe that Obama does not deserve a second term by a margin of 49 to 43 percent. But Palin is viewed unfavorable by 51 percent of voters. And among independents, the key swing voting bloc, her negative is at 54 percent. She is not the right candidate right now.

Framing the presidential contest ahead, Mona Charen put it well: “Voters chose a novice with plenty of star power in 2008 and will be inclined to swing strongly in the other direction in 2012. Americans will be looking for sober competence, managerial skill, and maturity, not sizzle and flash.”

If Palin runs, I think the entire Republican primary process will be hijacked. With ardent fans and a rabid media, it will become Palin-palooza. A celebrity fest will follow with even more amplitude than the adulation and adoration that surrounded Barack Obama, who was so revered he was sometimes referred to in biblical proportions as “The One.” An all-consuming super nova, Palin will suck the oxygen out of every room, everywhere she goes. And one of two things will happen. Discerning conservative voters in early primary states will be offended by the circus-like atmosphere and the presumption that they could so easily fall for a “cult of personality.” And they will vote against her. And she will lose. Or, Republican voters will be completely swept up in the mania and nominate her as the GOP standard bearer to go up against President Obama. And she will lose—perhaps the only Republican nominee who could lose in 2012.

But I also think she shouldn’t run for her sake. How could life get any better? She has more power, money, control, and influence than she could have ever possibly imagined. Two bestselling books, almost 2.5 million Facebook fans, a record-breaking cable TV show, and a daughter who made it to the finals on another TV show—not because of her abilities, but because she’s Sarah Palin’s daughter, and by god, the Palinistas out there defiantly come to her rescue week after week.

Palin is having fun. She decided governing Alaska was, well, just a pain. Too much work. A hassle. Whatever. Next. There I go again, denigrating. See, it’s just a reflex. It’s easy to discount her accomplishments, and to ignore the ludicrous opposition Palin faced in the courts and in the press on her return to office from the campaign trail. But my point is, all the fun, the money, the power will only be diminished if she runs. Because, I don’t care how you cut it, in the end she will lose. She is just too polarizing a figure at this point in her career to win a general election. And if the Republicans lose to a weakened President Obama, she will forever be blamed for snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

But I know how these things go. First of all, as James Carville said, running for president is like sex. Once you’ve done it, it’s hard to stop. Second, once the drum beat starts, and all your friends and admirers start telling you, “For the sake of the Republic, it’s your duty to run,” it’s awfully hard not to let your ego get filled with a lot of helium. Next thing you know, you’re shivering at a diner in January in Iowa.

I know there are millions of conservative women and young grizzlettes out there who admire Sarah Palin. She inspires them; she is them. They know that beneath the sequined lapel pin roars the heart of a Mama Grizzly wronged. And they are offended when elites, the media, and smart asses like me dismiss her infectious optimism, her pitch-fork populism, and her love of family, faith and the flag.

In my view, it would have been interesting to see what would have happened to her as a political figure had she not been plucked too soon from obscurity, if she had been allowed to ripen on the vine for a couple of terms as governor of Alaska before emerging on the national scene. Alas, she was thrown onto the rocket sled of celebrity and has ridden to heights never before seen.

And if Palin doesn't run for the top slot, she will very likely be on the short list again for vice president. Or certainly for a cabinet slot if the Republicans win.

Only one thing is for sure. Sarah Palin is going to be around for a very long time. She’s already had a few last laughs, and she’s likely to have a whole lot more before the closing credits roll. ’Cause life as America’s sweetheart—and siren for the left—is “flippin’ fun.”

No matter what happens, whether she runs for president or not, Palin is going to be Pot Stirrer-in-Chief.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; benedictromney; brutusromney; markmckinnon; mckinnon; mckinnon4romney; mckinnonaxelrodrahm; palin; romney; romneyagain; romneyfakepoll; romneypimp; romneyprop; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last
To: roses of sharon

Palin would be one of the best things to happen to the US. She would clean up the corruption in DC, restore our liberties, and not try to control every fricking little aspect of our life.

Because the American people chose a man with a clear Marxist racist background based on a slogan, I do not believe America deserves a President Palin. It deserve what it has: a “liberal” president who now forms a SA (TSA) group to violate their persons; a first lady who is telling us what to eat; an economy where you MUST join a union to get a job. America must face a harsh reality for its foolishness, and for tolerating Marxists for the past 100 years.


41 posted on 11/25/2010 9:36:13 AM PST by Clock King (Ellisworth Toohey was right: My head's gonna explode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac
She is Obama’s greatest hope.

Odd, isn't it? Obama was supposed to be the one to bring all Americans together, and yet it may very well be Sarah who does that if she runs.

Not only will she have the Tea Partiers and Independents behind her, but Obama and the entire Left will support her candidacy too.

Obama has never been able to anything even close to that.

42 posted on 11/25/2010 9:37:31 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Sarah Palin makes a stand for conservatism and traditional American values everyday! It's fun to watch the liberals and RINO's heads explode over it on a daily basis. ;o)

Happy Thanksgiving Sarah!
If you're receiving flak ... you're over the target!

43 posted on 11/25/2010 9:37:47 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

The premise of this article is that all poll numbers, two years out from an election, are set in stone.

Another premise is that the winning formula for the Republicans is a guy who is old, boring, colorless, drab, bland, vanilla, attracts little enthusiasm or opposition, “knows how Washington works,” and, most of all, whose turn it is! Oh. Wait. They tried that.


44 posted on 11/25/2010 9:38:13 AM PST by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Next thing you know, you’re shivering at a diner in January in Iowa.

Mark McKinnon, that candy ass would be shivering. Sarah Palin would be basking in the warmth.

45 posted on 11/25/2010 9:38:19 AM PST by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac
We should be able to run a turkey and beat Obama after his horrendous conduct and poor management.

I think even John McCain would beat him, now.

46 posted on 11/25/2010 9:39:20 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Hey, Barack "Hubris" Obama, what are you hiding? Release your Birth Certificate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Framing the presidential contest ahead, Mona Charen put it well: “Voters chose a novice with plenty of star power in 2008 and will be inclined to swing strongly in the other direction in 2012. Americans will be looking for sober competence, managerial skill, and maturity, not sizzle and flash.”

OK, so I have heard this tripe a few times now. The election will not be about who is more experienced. A ridiculous argument when you consider Palin's resume against Obama. The election will be about Conservatism versus socialism, as it should be.

Palin has been to date the most effective counter to the rabid swing left under Obama. Her communication skills in framing the argument and making it so simple that even a Washington intellectual might understand it, will be the difference. NOBODY else currently on the GOP radar has shown that they have this ability. But that is what primary season will be all about.

47 posted on 11/25/2010 9:39:27 AM PST by Kandy Atz ("Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want for bread.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

This crap is coming from the RINO camp who would foist the likes of Romney and Shuckabee on us


48 posted on 11/25/2010 9:41:06 AM PST by clamper1797 (Pray for Obama ... Psalms 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
I myself, agree with about 90% of this - I also feel she is not ready (clearly, neither was Obama, but that does not mean we can go ahead and make that same mistake....by putting our own candidate in, that isn't ready).

Palin will serve the Country better by being a asset from outside of Washington.

49 posted on 11/25/2010 9:41:11 AM PST by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
And if Palin doesn't run for the top slot, she will very likely be on the short list again for vice president.

Despite the source, I was willing to read the article to determine if he was truly stating his professional opinion, or was simply trying to manipulate things. I was open-minded until the line above. ANYBODY of McKinnon's stature knows that Sarah Palin CANNOT be on anybody's short VP list.

1. She's been there, that hasn't been done before (or if it has, it is the answer to a trivia question.)

2. The VP is normally a spot where you DON'T want a candidate with high negatives, especially if you think you already have the lead without the pick. The Dems have a history of focusing on VP negatives. When Palin was picked, it was part crap shoot by McCain because he was behind, and part that she wasn't controversial at the time, and it might be hard for Obama/Biden to beat up on a girl in the ordinary way. She was considered conservative, but neither fringe nor controversial until the media got through with her.

3. Most presidential candidates don't want a VP who will get more attention than the top of the bill. This isn't just ego, it's good politics. Even a low key guy like Cheney caused some problems for Bush the Younger in that regard.

If McKinnon were just a Hollywood type, I could see such a mistake in judgement made and written. As a high level consultant, he is being 100% disingenuous.
50 posted on 11/25/2010 9:41:19 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
DNC: Run Sarah! (so our MSM Comrades can ridicule you)

GOP: Don't run Sarah! (you will clobber our RINOs in the primaries)

We the People: STFU and let US decide!

51 posted on 11/25/2010 9:41:46 AM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
They missed her most important qualification... She’s a community organizer.

ROFLOL!! Great one!

52 posted on 11/25/2010 9:42:18 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents
>> Could it be the 24/7 trashing she receives in the media <<

Of course, that's the overwhelming reason for her high unfavorables -- perhaps at a level of 95% causality. But it's as inevitable as is tomorrow's sunrise. All the King's horses and all the King's men aren't going to change this unfortunate reality.

>> the scoffing she gets even on "conservative" sites such as FR <<

Maybe that's 2 or 3% of the cause. But certainly not a big factor.

53 posted on 11/25/2010 9:42:53 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797

The good old boys club. The “establishment” ruling class isn’t very fond of Sarah Palin. She makes them and their accountants very nervous. She’s too “anti-establishment” for them. They are more comfortable with the status quo.


54 posted on 11/25/2010 9:44:51 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Don't touch my junk!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: OwatonnaNative
This joker doesn't have a clue. I've watched Palin since early 90's; talked to her every month or so when we lived in the MatSu. Paid attention to how effective she was as Governor; she did more than any gov I've ever seen up here.

Nobody looks at her record. I saw her cut wasteful spending and yet increase funding for Dem issues when they cost efficient and served the people. I remember when she funded Denali Kid Care that provided health care for all kids 18 & under that had none. She said oil prices are high, we have the extra money, it's the right thing to do. The Repubs went nuts, she said screw them and did it. I could tell ya more similar stories too.

Palin is the only political I'd trust, she has a record you know; which the media refuses to acknowledge. America will luv her like Reagen if she wins.

I also know that Palin would not run if it ensured a dem pres would be in another 4 years.

Honestly, I think it's going to get so bad over the next 2 years; anybody will beat Obama. Then Palin will save our Nation.

55 posted on 11/25/2010 9:45:20 AM PST by Eska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

She’s an ex “BUSH” advisor. Go figure!


56 posted on 11/25/2010 9:45:52 AM PST by convertedtoreason ( Nature tells us to take a LIBERTARIAN CONSERVATIVE stance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

She’s an ex “BUSH” advisor. Go figure!


57 posted on 11/25/2010 9:45:52 AM PST by convertedtoreason ( Nature tells us to take a LIBERTARIAN CONSERVATIVE stance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: convertedtoreason

He not she.

My bad.


58 posted on 11/25/2010 9:46:29 AM PST by convertedtoreason ( Nature tells us to take a LIBERTARIAN CONSERVATIVE stance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
I am coming to the realization that Sarah Palin is going to use these attacks from the “blue bloods” to her advantage. Sarah is the living example of someone who has put on the “full armor of God”, and neither the real progressives nor the progressive-lite blue bloods understand what that means.
59 posted on 11/25/2010 9:46:32 AM PST by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn
All the King's horses and all the King's men aren't going to change this unfortunate reality.

And so the libs have won, in doing exactly what they set out to do to her, and we should just pack it in and go home?

60 posted on 11/25/2010 9:47:15 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson