Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sometime lurker

You posted a lawyer quote from a WND article making an unsupported statement. There’s nothing that prevents a hospital from saying they did NOT admit or treat someone.


156 posted on 12/02/2010 9:54:02 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: edge919
You posted a lawyer quote from a WND article making an unsupported statement. There’s nothing that prevents a hospital from saying they did NOT admit or treat someone.

I posted a quote from a lawyer who represents hospitals. In her opinion, confirming or denying someone was a patient could be a HIPAA violation. Just the possibility of that would prevent many hospitals from confirming or denying.

If you google it, you'll see that several medical organizations have a "don't confirm or deny" policy, unless the person making enquiries can be confirmed to be authorized to receive the information. Here's one example, and I found several others: Wisconsin, Ohio, etc.

# Agency staff shall not discuss individually identifiable health information (e.g., client's diagnosis or condition) until the following can be confirmed:

If confirmation cannot be made, the agency shall not confirm or deny that the client has in the past or is currently receiving services from the agency. The caller's information can be recorded and provided to the client for disposition.


157 posted on 12/02/2010 10:24:33 PM PST by sometime lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson