1 posted on
12/04/2010 6:16:46 AM PST by
1rudeboy
To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama
2 posted on
12/04/2010 6:18:54 AM PST by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
So what we got here is Obama wants to cut import taxes, let us spend our own money as we want, and he wants to help our allies that stand up to Marxist thugs.
ok....
To: 1rudeboy
Has the United States EVER had a net gain (in either jobs or exports) from ANY of these free trade deals? Color me skeptical.
4 posted on
12/04/2010 6:25:50 AM PST by
rbg81
(When you see Obama, shout: "DO YOUR JOB!!")
To: 1rudeboy
I favor free trade - it has always been the one-way “not so free trade” that has bothered me. We trade - they tax our stuff, we don't tax their’s.
12 posted on
12/04/2010 7:05:31 AM PST by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
To: 1rudeboy
Curious.
First they embarrass Obama in front of the world by saying 'no deal', then they get backed into a corner with the mad dogs to the north and now sign on the dotted line.
Does Wikileaks have any new cables? Might be interesting...
To: 1rudeboy
Free trade is a bad idea. In the long run free trade will not work without a common government.
A better idea is a revenue tariff to make international trade a revenue-neutral event for the government.
The government collects income taxes on goods and services produced in the USA, so they should collect an equivalent amount in tariff on imported goods and services (maybe 22% ?).
And then let foreign countries do whatever they want. There would be no more need for trade negotiations or free-trade agreements.
18 posted on
12/04/2010 8:38:33 AM PST by
devere
To: 1rudeboy
The deal marks a victory for President Obama, who was widely criticized after failing to secure the pact during his Asia trip after last month's midterm elections.Exactly how? I wonder if the agreement was due to Obama backing off all the carp he attached to the Bush deal. Seems like a Bush win / Obama Fail to me.
19 posted on
12/04/2010 8:54:07 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Palin 2012: don't retreat, just reload)
To: 1rudeboy
im guessing it has something to do with North Korea
To: 1rudeboy
it might have been begun under Bush, but that was nowhere near the reality that we have today.
when obamanation approves/signs anything, Americans can be sure that it is NOT in their interest..
the man is a traitor to America
22 posted on
12/04/2010 3:49:29 PM PST by
bareford101
(For me, there is no difference in a tolerant, open mind and a cess pool. Both are open to filth.)
To: 1rudeboy
So how much does Soros have invested in SK?
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy. 23 posted on
12/04/2010 3:52:52 PM PST by
The Comedian
(Government: Saving people from freedom since time immemorial.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson