Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Democrats reject tax plan unless changed (AP)
AP ^ | By CHARLES BABINGTON and STEPHEN OHLEMACHER

Posted on 12/09/2010 11:09:27 AM PST by FatherofFive

WASHINGTON – House Democrats voted Thursday to reject President Barack Obama's tax deal with Republicans in its current form, but it was unclear how significantly the package might need to be changed. By voice vote in a closed caucus meeting, Democrats passed a resolution saying the tax package should not come to the House floor for consideration as written, even though no formal House bill has been drafted. Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., introduced the resolution.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: democrats; taxes; unemployment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
This is getting interesting.
1 posted on 12/09/2010 11:09:32 AM PST by FatherofFive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

Dems - party of No (snicker)


2 posted on 12/09/2010 11:11:23 AM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

They agree with Palin! wow!


3 posted on 12/09/2010 11:11:23 AM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
This will doom the rest of the Obama butts. They are the least employable and LAZY. They thought they were going to get a free ride.

What I don't like is unemployment for THREE YEARS is insane. They must DO something. Get part time jobs. Start a business. That's what we did. We started a business. We are on NO government assistance and living off savings. It can be done! We are doing it and we have our dignity and Protestant work ethic intact.

4 posted on 12/09/2010 11:12:59 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

Woohoo! Now KILL it for good. No compromising with Hussein.


5 posted on 12/09/2010 11:13:26 AM PST by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

“Democrats passed a resolution saying the tax package should not come to the House floor for consideration as written, even though no formal House bill has been drafted. Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., introduced the resolution.”

So something is written but it can NOT be voted on and there is no formal WRITTEN resolution. This is crazy.


6 posted on 12/09/2010 11:14:21 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

No,they don’t agree with Palin atleast I hope NOT.
Demoncrats don’t want Bush tax cuts extended. Is this what Palin wants too?


7 posted on 12/09/2010 11:15:23 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

Part of the deal was extending unemployment benefits. Lets milk this:

The democrats are denying relief to the unemployed. Millions will have an unhappy Christmas.


8 posted on 12/09/2010 11:15:23 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahaha! ! ! ! ! !
I've seen the "voice votes" happen before. They're a foregone conclusion.
9 posted on 12/09/2010 11:16:04 AM PST by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

Jim DeMint doesn’t like the Bill either because of the Unemployment Benefits extension.


10 posted on 12/09/2010 11:16:23 AM PST by no dems (DeMINT / PALIN 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat

I don’t want ANY compromise with the devil, Obama either.

It’s time to play HARD BALL. Obama is a wimp and eventually the Republicans can get what they want. They just have to hang in there and put it to that S.O.B..


11 posted on 12/09/2010 11:16:44 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nmh

She is against the bill because of the unemployment extention, but they both want it dead.


12 posted on 12/09/2010 11:17:23 AM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
By voice vote in a closed caucus meeting

Typical transparency.

13 posted on 12/09/2010 11:18:01 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd
“Part of the deal was extending unemployment benefits. Lets milk this:

The democrats are denying relief to the unemployed. Millions will have an unhappy Christmas.”

Do you really believe that people should be on unemployment for THREE YEARS? THREE YEARS? That is what the extension would allow. That is over the top!

The ROOT problem must be addressed. The PRIVATE SECTOR must be allowed to GROW and not be penalized. As entrepreneurs, we'd LOVE to hire but can't. The hell care bill is fuzzy and when you are in start up mode, hell care is the last thing on your mind. We don't have ANY health care insurance right now. We are NOT on ANY government assistance either.

It is galling that people who are unemployed should get THREE YEARS of UNEMPLOYMENT. It will bite us later and will NEVER END unless BUSINESS is allowed to hire and make money. We can't ALL work for the government or DRAIN TAX PAYERS with UNEMPLOYMENT. It's WRONG and people have to GET OUT THERE and DO SOMETHING!

14 posted on 12/09/2010 11:21:01 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Do you really believe that people should be on unemployment for THREE YEARS? THREE YEARS? That is what the extension would allow. That is over the top!

Talk about misinformation! That is wrong is so many ways.

The current max for UB's is 99 weeks. This bill does NOT change that.

And many states have a max of 79, not 99, weeks.....about half of what you posted.
15 posted on 12/09/2010 11:23:37 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Planning on using 911? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

Republicans had better hope that the ‘RATS put a poison pill in it because that’s the only way they can save face and oppose the bill. Otherwise they’ll have to hope the ‘RATS kill the bill themselves.

Incompetent Republicans have stepped in it again and allowed Obama to frame the argument so that he’ll come out smelling like a rose no matter what happens.

Where Is the leadership in the Republican party? Why aren’t they running to the microphone too, to counteract him every time B.O. runs out there to spew his false premises”.

Why do they continue to sit back like bumps on a log and allow themselves to be blind-sided and rolled by the ‘RATS every day of the week.

I am sick to death of these dumbasses.


16 posted on 12/09/2010 11:23:58 AM PST by Matchett-PI ( Sarah Palin / Marco Rubio - a "can't lose" ticket for 2012..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC
“She is against the bill because of the unemployment extension, but they both want it dead.”

I AGREE with that.

When you “get lemons in life, you find a way to make lemonade.” People have to buck up. We did. We haven't made any money yet, but we are as determined as hell to make it and NOT have the government TAKE the fruits of our labor. We know it's tough out there. We are living off our savings. We are the kindof people Obama HATES the most, WHITE and marching forward to keep our dignity and giving him the "bird". We never lived "large" and always saved. Thank GOD we did that.

17 posted on 12/09/2010 11:24:32 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nmh
I don't think it's 3 years.

I think it's 99 weeks. Which is still too long, granted, but the bill doesn't extend that.

18 posted on 12/09/2010 11:25:11 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Obama to frame the argument so that he’ll come out smelling like a rose no matter what happens.

When I first heard this, I wondered if it wasn't the plan all along.

19 posted on 12/09/2010 11:26:12 AM PST by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Obama to frame the argument so that he’ll come out smelling like a rose no matter what happens.

When I first heard this, I wondered if it wasn't the plan all along.

20 posted on 12/09/2010 11:26:12 AM PST by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson