As any employer would, they also go on trend of work output to predict future performance. Counting his pre-ISU work as you would like then becomes extremely damning for him, since his output dropped significantly compared to his pre-ISU work.
See what I mean? No facts can get past the true believer.
Meanwhile, I am prepared to admit that such a case is possible and could be happening now with the subject of this thread. I am looking at Gonzalez only on the facts.
RE: As any employer would,
But would he be RIGHT? NO. Based on the evidence.
And I repeat -— the tenure criteria DID NOT MENTION work while at ISU. That was added as an excuse later.
And again — 68 peer-reviewed journal articles (of which 21 have been while he was at ISU) exceed the 15 required by ISU by 350 per cent!
I stand by what I believe to be the case — HOSTILITY TO ANYTHING SUGGESTIVE OF ALTERNATIVE IDEAS ( even while they were presented OUTSIDE his academic work ).