Nobody, since it requires a prosecutor to go after them. But the evidence clearly shows Bonsell and Buckingham lied on multiple occasions. In one case in their depositions they lied about the source of funds for the purchase of the Pandas book. Not only that, but it was a lie that affected the court procedings, as it caused the plaintiffs to not seek a temporary restraining order. They must have been friends with the DA, because that was a slam-dunk perjury case.
So, nobody was officially convicted of perjury and yet you go about stating it as fact.
That's the sort of subjective, partial nonsense that really cuts into the credibility of those who claim the objectivity of being a alleged scientist. It's very unworthy of them. And you.
But the evidence clearly shows Bonsell and Buckingham lied on multiple occasions. In one case in their depositions they lied about the source of funds for the purchase of the Pandas book. Not only that, but it was a lie that affected the court procedings, as it caused the plaintiffs to not seek a temporary restraining order. They must have been friends with the DA, because that was a slam-dunk perjury case.
Innocent until proved guilty. If there was no formal charge and conviction of perjury, it's slanderous to state that they perjured themselves as if it were a fact.