In their haste, they did not put in a severance clause. If any part of the bill is ultimately found to be unconstitutional,,, the whole bill dies. Maybe they should have read the bill.
Sometimes its difficult to see a “silver lining” to a cloud like “Pass the Bill so we can find out what’s in it”. Which at the time was about the most arrogant assinine thing I had very heard from a politician.
Crooks often over look minor details in their rush.
Is that correct?