Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor
The present court ruled in full accordance with the regulations that previous congresses have put in place.

Doublethink.

Do you have any clue as to what Appelate Jurisdiction is?

The jurisdiction exercised by the Supreme Court if and when it hears this issue. Nice foot shot.

There was no legislation from this bench. Its findings were based on the literal reading of the text of the constitution

Ah, yes, the individual mandate clause. Look out Social Security!

So in your opinion, discarding the constitution is just acceptable politics?

No, that would be you. You want the courts to legislate. You want the courts to decide political questions. You depend on imaginary clauses in the Constitution.

Congress should repeal the legislation, notwithstanding your opposition to and contempt for representative government.

72 posted on 12/13/2010 8:14:30 PM PST by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Mojave

It is you that depends on not just an imaginary clause, but a complete imaginary article rifing above the rest of the constitution.

Nothing that you choose to believe is anywheres to be found in the constitution, and redress of extraconstitutional action is not in any way related to legislation; it is the very purpose of the appelate courts.


75 posted on 12/13/2010 8:23:05 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson