> “ It reflects your mindset exactly.”
.
No, it reflects the opposite!
Nothing in the constitution gives the court or the congress the power to address “privacy” in any way.
In this case we have the court correctly recognizing that congress has legislated in an area forbidden to it by the limitations of the nineth and tenth ammendments.
Thus it is a perfect inverse of the Roe usurpation.
Roe v. Wade was NOT an act of Congress, it was an act of judicial legislation by the Supreme Court. That's what you advocate.