Posted on 12/16/2010 3:09:51 PM PST by mojito
Starting in the early 1980s, up through well into 2009, the individual mandate was an eminently respectable Republican position, embraced by conservative policy wonks and leading Republicans. Since then, virtually the whole of the conservative movement has coalesced around the position that the individual mandate is not merely misguided but actually unconstitutional, a fact conservatives somehow overlooked during the previous three decades.
Indeed, conservatives now believe that the policy they once embraced (or at least tolerated) would amount to an abrogation of the very principle of limited government.
(Excerpt) Read more at tnr.com ...
One either believes in the virtues of limited government, or one does not.
But that's a distinction that's probably too subtle for a great liberal thinker like Chaitt.
We’re winning.
No more “bleeding heart” or “compassionate” conservatism.
Screw “compassionate” conservatism”.
What a crock
1984- "doublethink".
“the individual mandate was an eminently respectable Republican position, embraced by conservative policy wonks and leading Republicans”
When you can define the position of your opponent, it makes arguing with them alot easier. It’s easy to label people as hypocrites when you can create their inconsistencies out of whole cloth.
When? The article throws this red herring out, but provides no substantiation.
Liberals often use other ‘conservatives’ and Republicans as foils... “even XYZ believed in such-and-such, why can’t you?” is their claim.
never do they admit that many liberals are in dissent.
Nor do they ever acknowledge what the great body of conservative thought is thinking, or give it the respect it deserves.
Just foils for their arguments.
In any event, it is a good sign that we are more lucid in our thinking now than some republicans were twenty years ago.
“They are also forcing the rest of us to pay higher insurance rates, now that insurance companies can no longer exclude those with preexisting conditions.”
Statements like this amount to willful stupidity. It’s the government healthcare law (not conservatives) that prevent insurance companies from taking preexisting conditions into account.
>>We’re winning.<<
I agree. I’ve been listening to the local station that was formerly our AIR America station, simply for comic relief and a breather from listening to people I agree with, and I’ve noticed a subtle shift. They still act like children and make ludicrous arguments and then pat themselves on the back for being so smart, but there is an almost tangible deflation in their spirit. It’s kinda fun to listen to them.
They are a bit like low level employees complaining about management decisions that are really hurting them, but they are powerless to change. And they cannot grasp that management is doing exactly the right thing.
If you are going to let the NeoCons run the republican party you better get used to “big government” conservatism and compassionate conservatism.
I could find a couple of Democrats who were pro-life. Does this mean that we can call out the left’s hypocrisy on that issue? I mean, they MUST all be pro-life after listening to these few.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.