Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2111USMC

Before the DADT, the military was authorized to ask its recruits and servicemen about their sexual orientation. So, the folks pushing to “repeal” DADT, are they attempting to go back to the way it was before? This has been bugging me the language that has been used. The fact is, they are not not just repealing DADT, they are replacing it. Repealing would simply imply that homosexuals were forbidden to serve, and were subjected to question.


200 posted on 12/18/2010 12:58:58 PM PST by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: castlegreyskull
Yep, that's been grating on me too.

When we went through the entrance examinations they asked you straight up if your were a homo. Any affirmative response got your ass booted out the door immediately.

DADT was implemented by the Clinton administration to open the door for fags. The purpose of this so called “repeal” is to open the door all of the way so that psycho perverts can practice their disgusting behavior/sickness openly.

213 posted on 12/18/2010 1:12:51 PM PST by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

To: castlegreyskull

I would also add that it repulses me that the top commanders of the different military branches approve of gays serving. It just proves that the highest in command are nothing but uniform-wearing civilian politicians kissing butt.

The exception, of course, was the Commandant of the Marine Corps. But that’s because he’s a Marine.


230 posted on 12/18/2010 1:23:30 PM PST by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

To: castlegreyskull
Before the DADT, the military was authorized to ask its recruits and servicemen about their sexual orientation. So, the folks pushing to “repeal” DADT, are they attempting to go back to the way it was before? This has been bugging me the language that has been used. The fact is, they are not not just repealing DADT, they are replacing it. Repealing would simply imply that homosexuals were forbidden to serve, and were subjected to question.

Which is of course how it should be. In a normal, non-leftist indoctrated emasculated military.

296 posted on 12/18/2010 2:36:34 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson