Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I have been thinking that most homosexual men will not expose their sexuality in the military, despite this law. However, I do believe that this whole thing is due to lesbians in the military who want to make their lifestyle public knowledge. Men, regardless of their sexuality, would be hesitant in most cases to arouse the ire of fellow soldiers in combat. I believe they are that realistic. Women, on the other hand, have no such fears, and homosexual women, particularly today, are out to make a huge statement. It is disgusting.


19 posted on 12/18/2010 11:27:30 PM PST by sueuprising (The best of it is, God is with us-John Wesley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sueuprising

I think you’re right.


29 posted on 12/19/2010 12:01:10 AM PST by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: sueuprising

In the early nineties, there were groups of male sodomites on board the USS Carl Vinson. They organized themselves in such a way as to harass heterosexuals, even going so far as to “drop” tools from height on those that would not “tolerate” their group. They called themselves the “family”, and they were known among the command structure. My niece was dating one such victim of an attack, and he and his friends would talk openly of this at BBQ’s and parties they attended at my house. I wonder how bad it is now? How much worse can it get?


62 posted on 12/19/2010 4:51:26 AM PST by runninglips (Don't support the Republican party, work to "fundamentally change" it...conservative would be nice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: sueuprising

I’ve been thinking the same thing. I don’t think the men will come out (much). I do think the lesbians will.

I also am wondering how many gay men will actually enlist for combat service. Every gay male I’ve met through work or school in the past was both completely uninterested and completely unsuited for that.

LQ


106 posted on 12/19/2010 8:10:09 AM PST by LizardQueen (The world is not out to get you, except in the sense that the world is out to get everyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: sueuprising

First, we need to define homosexuality. Homosexuality is a sexual appitite and set of sexual behaviors. When it is in the closet, it is not interacting in life outside the closet. When it is out of the closet, it is interacting in life outside the closet. With speical rights it is interacting sexually out of the closet and everyone is ordered to shut up about whatever it does.

The Congress and the military brass decided to release homosexuality out of the closet in military life. It will be interacting with soldiers, with the protection of political correctness to harm anyone who does not celebrate it’s interaction with them.

Look what they have done in public schools! Many said that gays would never bother children with anal sex and other homosexual behaviors should we permit homosexuality out of the closet in our schools. They were totally wrong about that. Gays have gone a long way to break down all taboos of adult porn indoctrination - physical and mental - with other people’s children in the name of tolerance. Given we do not protect children from gay sexual harassment and abuse, what makes you think we are going to protect soldiers?


110 posted on 12/19/2010 8:36:32 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: sueuprising

I agree with you. Growing up in the city of SF in the 70s and 80s (mostly men, I never saw lesbians then) was nothing compared to the lesbos living in Tucson, AZ from the 80s on.


135 posted on 12/19/2010 10:20:48 AM PST by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson