“A certified copy of Obama’s birth records can be obtained via subpoena. Hawaii Revised Statutes 338-18(b)(9) permit release of a confidential birth record to: “a person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction”
A certified birth certificate is nothing more than a certified record which contains: Place of birth, hospital of birth, attending physician.
What is so important about obama’s certificate that has required a teams( at a cost of over 2 million dollars) of attorneys fighting since January 2008 to make sure that a copy never is released to the public?
A reasonable person would assume that there is something about that “document “ that obama can never allow to be released.
There is more evidence that obama was born in Kenya than Hawaii, but it is unlikely that any judge will accept the information as evidence.
A certified birth certificate is nothing more than a certified record which contains: Place of birth, hospital of birth, attending physician.
What is so important about obama’s certificate that has required a teams( at a cost of over 2 million dollars) of attorneys fighting since January 2008 to make sure that a copy never is released to the public?
A reasonable person would assume that there is something about that “document “ that obama can never allow to be released.
There is more evidence that obama was born in Kenya than Hawaii, but it is unlikely that any judge will accept the information as evidence.
There is NO evidence that Obama was born in Kenya other than a forged internet document that got the dates of Kenya’s becoming a republic wrong and turned out to be a copy of an Australian man’s birth certificate.
As a federal judge said: “A spurious claim questioning the president’s constitutional legitimacy may be protected by the First Amendment, but a Court’s placement of its imprimatur upon A CLAIM THAT IS SO LACKING IN FACTUAL SUPPORT THAT IT IS FRIVOLOUS would undoubtedly disserve the public interest.”—US District Court Judge Clay R. Land, September 16, 2009 “Rhodes v MacDonald”
And another federal judge said: “This is one of several such suits brought by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution. This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”—Chief US District Court Judge for the District of Columbia, Royce C. Lamberth, April 15, 2010, “Taitz v Obama.”
I guess under the omegadawn theory, there are no judges in America who are “rational persons.”
A grand jury investigation would allow for Obama’s birth records to be subpoenaed, it would allow testimony from officials in Kenya, Indonesia and Hawaii, and it would allow document authentification experts to examine Obama’s original birth records. In the nearly four years since Obama announced his intention to run for President (February 10, 2007) no one has bothered to convene a grand jury investigation and since Watergate, every investigation of the presidency has been conducted by a Grand Jury.