[Westbrook]

> Which is rather ironic coming from a group that wants to
> force us back to the ‘stone age’.

There were no wood stoves in the stone age.

But there were far fewer people.

Reduction of the human population to what they consider to be “sustainable” is their goal. One of 0bamma’s cabinet is a cosigner of a manifesto that promotes reducing the human population on earth to 250 million, about 25 times less than the current population.

[UCANSEE2]

There were no wood stoves in the stone age.

Well, I wouldn't burn anything in a wood stove anyway. It might catch on fire.

However, 'stone age' men burned their wood in or on something, and used it not only to cook, but to provide heat. I believe they made their stoves out of rocks, instead of iron, or brick, but they had stoves.

[UCANSEE2]

Reduction of the human population to what they consider to be “sustainable” is their goal.

In other words, they would be LIKE GODS, deciding who lives, who dies. Of course, THEY are always on the KEEPER list. Always.