Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL


18 posted on 01/04/2011 2:31:27 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Liberty Valance

facts matter not to the 9th Circus


26 posted on 01/04/2011 2:46:43 PM PST by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Liberty Valance

Wow!

If that truely is on private land, the 9th circuit needs to be disbanded.


27 posted on 01/04/2011 2:48:48 PM PST by dirtman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Liberty Valance
If that sign is there, why isn't it considered private property? If not, can we simply then claim it is "art"? Are they going to order its destruction? If so, will they use PUBLIC workers to tear it down?

BTW, I thought this was already settled as constitutional. Maybe I was thinking of that other Cross that was vandalized by the tolerant left.

44 posted on 01/04/2011 4:04:22 PM PST by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson