Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tucson: Obama Does Best When He Says Nothing (Chauncey Gardiner?)
http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/01/obama_does_best_when_he_says_n.html ^

Posted on 01/15/2011 8:23:01 AM PST by cycle of discernment

January 14, 2011 Obama Does Best When He Says Nothing By Jack Cashill

In Tucson, on Wednesday evening, we saw President Barack Obama in his full Chauncey Gardiner mode. After the drubbing of November 2010, Obama's handlers have come to understand that Obama does best when, like Chauncey, he says nothing at all.

Chauncey Gardiner, the reader may recall, is the protagonist of Jerzy Kosinski's 1971 prescient satire, Being There, which was later made into a movie of the same name, co-scripted by Kosinski.

As the plot goes, Chance the Gardener, a sheltered simpleton, finds himself thrust into the world upon the death oh his wealthy protector, his name now misinterpreted as "Chauncey Gardiner."

Forced to interact with society, the supremely bland Chauncey so impresses politicos and the media with banal gardening clichés -- "It is the responsibility of the gardener to adjust to the bad seasons as well as enjoy the good ones" -- that they assume Chauncey means much more than he actually does.

Gardiner's amiable emptiness impresses the president and quickly thrusts him onto the national stage. As he becomes a valued economic advisor -- "In a garden, growth has its season" -- the president decides to review Chance's history. To his horror, he finds that that history, much like Obama's, is entirely elusive.

"What do you mean, no background?" says the president. "That's impossible -- he's a very well known man!" No matter. As book and movie end, Chance is being considered for the presidency of the United States.

In Being There, it was businessman Ben Rand who took Chauncey under his wing and molded him into a national figure. In Illinois, it was David Axelrod who molded Barack Obama. Although Obama had a history, he reached the national stage because Axelrod suppressed it and the media chose not to know it or share it.

What wowed the masses on the campaign trail was Obama's ability to say next to nothing and make it sound as pleasantly ambivalent as Chance did. Indeed, at the start of Obama's Senate career in 2005, Newsweek made Obama its cover boy under the heading "The Color Purple."

This represented a full media buy-in to the conceit Obama had advanced in his God-fearing, flag-waving 2004 convention keynote speech. There, he ceremoniously rejected the blue state-red state dichotomy and insisted that "there's not a liberal America and a conservative America; there's the United States of America."

Obama's 2006 book, The Audacity of Hope, gave new meaning to the phrase "purple prose." In his otherwise flattering review, Time Magazine's Joe Klein counted no fewer than fifty instances of "excruciatingly judicious on-the-one-hand-on-the-other-handedness" in Audacity. He called the tendency "so pronounced that it almost seems an obsessive-compulsive tic." Of course, Audacity, like the Tucson speech, was thoroughly insincere, a cynical feint to the center.

At Tucson, Obama had the opportunity to address the left's preposterous "blood libel" of the right that followed Saturday's shootings, and at times, he seemed on the verge of doing so before, alas, retreating into butter knife-sharp banality.

"We are far too eager to lay the blame for all that ails the world at the feet of those who think differently than [sic] we do," he said at one point, but of course he refused to identify those laying the blame or their victims. He continued, "It's important for us to pause for a moment and make sure that we are talking with each other in a way that heals, not a way that wounds."

This past week's slanderers, who know the opposition only in caricature, surely heard that remark and felt vindicated. Yes, we heal. They wound. We love. They hate.

"Hate is not a family value," read the bumper stickers of our progressive friends. Other than perhaps piercing or recycling, they seem to have no more satisfying a pastime than attributing hate to their political enemies.

Obama addressed the issue of blame again later in the speech. "But what we can't do," he said, his fingers firmly crossed, "is use this tragedy as one more occasion to turn on one another." That, however, is exactly what the president's allies did do, and they did so with impunity. Obama refused to hold them responsible. To do so would have squandered all the political capital he and they had amassed during the past week.

Under normal circumstances, the president does all that is politically possible to neuter Christianity -- draping the name of Jesus at his Georgetown speech, for instance, or celebrating a "non-religious Christmas" in the White House. At Tucson, he did a passable imitation of Billy Graham.

Obama cited the Psalms on one occasion and Job on another, and he concluded with a salutation so explicitly Judeo-Christian that George Bush would have blushed to deliver it.

"May God bless and keep those we've lost in restful and eternal peace," said Obama, the defiantly masculine "He" capitalized in the official transcript. "May He love and watch over the survivors. And may He bless the United States of America."

In Being There, when Chance makes his first televised speech, Louise, the maid who helped rear him, weighs in on what she is seeing.

Gobbledegook! All the time he talked gobbledegook! An' it's for sure a White man's world in America, hell, I raised that boy since he was the size of a pissant an' I'll say right now he never learned to read an' write -- no sir! Had no brains at all, was stuffed with rice puddin' between the ears! Short-changed by the Lord and dumb as a jackass, an' look at him now! Yes, sir -- all you gotta be is white in America an' you get whatever you want! Just listen to that boy gobbledegook!

To be fair, Obama learned to read. In fact, he reads with a certain flair. What he never learned to do was write, at least not very well. The principal craftsman behind Audacity, a book produced by committee, was almost surely speechwriter Jon Favreau, who likely penned the Tucson speech as well. What the book and speech have in common is that they are both gobbledegook.

I suppose a sign of progress is that today, even a black man can get to be president on the wings of it -- at least if he sounds like a white liberal.

Jack Cashill's new book, Deconstructing Obama, can be pre-ordered here, with a special offer for American Thinker readers.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: giffords; sourcetitlenoturl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 01/15/2011 8:23:03 AM PST by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Does this mean they have discovered that he was over exposed?


2 posted on 01/15/2011 8:29:42 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

He impressed the Fox Allstars, though.


3 posted on 01/15/2011 8:29:52 AM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
Tucson: Obama Does Best When He Says Nothing


4 posted on 01/15/2011 8:41:53 AM PST by Iron Munro (When a society loses its memory, it descends inevitably into dementia - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
Interestingly, this was a comparison I made 7 months before the election.
“Yes. In the garden, growth has it seasons. First comes spring and summer, but then we have fall and winter. And then we get spring and summer again – and CHANGE. DON’T FORGET CHANGE!”

Photobucket


5 posted on 01/15/2011 8:42:30 AM PST by Dick Bachert (2012 CAN'T COME SOON ENOUGH FOR ME. HOW ABOUT YOU?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Any time that dickhead is on TV I have to change the channel.

I feel dumber for every second I watch him.

I may give O’Reilly’s interview a try. I’m afraid however Bill’s head may implode and that wouldn’t be good.


6 posted on 01/15/2011 8:47:45 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

And just as all the “important” socialites and leaders tried to tie themselves to Chauncy, so do today’s glitteratti attempt to tie themselves to Obambi’s wagon. The Emporer indeed is naked.


7 posted on 01/15/2011 9:02:59 AM PST by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
"I may give O’Reilly’s interview a try."

Knowing O'Reilly, and what an obama suck-up he is, he'll probably make my head explode before obama does by pandering to the illegal immigrant.
8 posted on 01/15/2011 9:03:20 AM PST by FrankR (The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

That is SO on target. And we FReepers have been calling him Chauncy Gardner from the time he entered the national spotlight.


9 posted on 01/15/2011 9:09:53 AM PST by FrdmLvr (Death to tyrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
I feel dumber for every second I watch him.

You are not alone.

10 posted on 01/15/2011 9:17:20 AM PST by Graybeard58 (Don't tell Obama what comes after a trillion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

“Being There” is one of my favorite films and Peter Sellers (in his next to last movie role) and Melvyn Douglas (in his last movie role) are just superb in their roles. The subtle humor that Sellers delivers is in such stark contrast to most comedy films that feel they have to bash you over the head with the joke in fear that you won’t get it.

It’s really a satire on the political class who are supposedly smarter than everyone else and so “smart” that they can be fooled by the exploits of a simpleton.

But Barack Obama is no simpleton. He’s not brilliant, like the Left wants you to believe but he is a Harvard-educated socialist/Marxist who probably dreams of taking the country much father left than he has but America has now waken up from its slumber and is opposing him.

He admires dictators and tyrants. He sees China as utopia. He wants a world of massive, unrelenting government control and everything he does should be viewed in that context.

Obama’s no genius but he’s also no moron. He’s a product of our hard-left university professors of whom he implicitly trusts.


11 posted on 01/15/2011 9:18:05 AM PST by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

I love “Being There” - I’ve got to watch it again soon.

A great scene:

Ron Steigler: Mr. Gardner, uh, my editors and I have been wondering if you would consider writing a book for us, something about your um, political philosophy, what do you say?

Chance the Gardener: I can’t write.

Ron Steigler: Heh, heh, of course not, who can nowadays? Listen, I have trouble writing a postcard to my children. Look uhh, we can give you a six figure advance, I’ll provide you with the very best ghost-writer, proof-readers...

Chance the Gardener: I can’t read.

Ron Steigler: Of course you can’t! No one has the time! We, we glance at things, we watch television...

Chance the Gardener: I like to watch TV.

Ron Steigler: Oh, oh, oh sure you do. No one reads!

(And then they hire Bill Ayers - lol)


12 posted on 01/15/2011 9:52:19 AM PST by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
it was David Axelrod who molded Barack Obama. Although Obama had a history, he reached the national stage because Axelrod suppressed it and the media chose not to know it or share it.

This gloss is counterproductive. Jack Cashill has done outstanding work uncovering Obama, but here he works against our understanding of Chauncey Gardner's past. Our own Chauncy has a real, well-documented past that reveals a near-30 year involvement with socialist groups and leaders. Axelrod was just one of a galaxy of stars in this movement, and by no means the most crucial one. Stanley Kurtz unravels Chauncey's movements, and it is only through learning each of these organizations and how they operate can we begin to combat this stealth socialism. Radical-in-Chief needs to be our Alinsky manual, which we need to implement in every state, if we are to begin to undo the chains ravelling around us.
13 posted on 01/15/2011 9:54:41 AM PST by jobim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Is it a coincidence that I was listeing to a line from Keith Whitley’s song “you say it best when you say nothing at all” just as I was reading this thread? LOL


14 posted on 01/15/2011 10:00:02 AM PST by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBFv4JaKq4s

at .50 seconds on the video.....there is such great irony that align to today-—do watch :-)


15 posted on 01/15/2011 10:06:24 AM PST by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

‘No background, nothing - zilch...’

Hmm, where have I seen (not seen) that before.

Thanks for the link - looks like the whole movie in segments - will watch again!


16 posted on 01/15/2011 10:11:34 AM PST by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

I remember that one! You did a great job.


17 posted on 01/15/2011 10:22:36 AM PST by FrdmLvr (Death to tyrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Have you ever notice how frequently he’s in the news? A newscast doesn’t go by whether on the TV or radio that isn’t about 0bama. He’s in the paper every day. Presidents should not have this much presence in our lives.


18 posted on 01/15/2011 10:24:42 AM PST by FrdmLvr (Death to tyrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Indeed Obama is Chauncey Gardiner in black it’s affirmative action on the move.Some things just don’t work out no matter how much you wish it so.


19 posted on 01/15/2011 10:58:05 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

BOR cares for nothing but ratings. I’ll grant that he understands the broadcast business. But bottom line he’s a ratings whore.

That is why his weekly lineup includes Glenn Beck, Dennis Miller, Laura Ingraham, the Quiz, etc. Outside of his intro monologue, his personal convictions are, shall we say, flexible.

He’s a master of self-promotion, which is the common bond between him and GB. The difference is GB is indeed educating the public. BOR is simply trying to occupy their time and accumulate $$$$.

JMHO.


20 posted on 01/15/2011 11:55:23 AM PST by hotshu (Keep America's Faith, that's all 0bama and his fellow traitors can't steal from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson