To: WildSnail
The problem with cutting spending is that you have to defend your proposed cuts - and you're going to run into a buzzsaw of bureaucratic opposition.
The better approach is to assume everything (All Gov't agencies, depts and programs) are eliminated".In other words, not a dime of taxpayer money is committed.
Then every Gov't Dept, Agencie and program will need to justify their existence and every dime they want or need.
56 posted on
01/20/2011 1:03:58 PM PST by
Riodacat
(And when all is said and done, there'll be a hell of a lot more said than done......)
To: Riodacat
The better approach is to assume everything (All Gov't agencies, depts and programs) are eliminated".In other words, not a dime of taxpayer money is committed. Then every Gov't Dept, Agencie and program will need to justify their existence and every dime they want or need. WINNER WINNER CHICKEN DINNER !!!
58 posted on
01/20/2011 1:11:53 PM PST by
davidosborne
(2012 will be the year of the INDEPENDENT CONSERVATIVE ! let's GOOOH !)
To: Riodacat
I love this idea.
We know there is bleed over between depts.
A fullscale top to bottom AUDIT is well overdue.
79 posted on
01/20/2011 3:01:10 PM PST by
Marty62
(Marty 60)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson