Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Americans are angry with us for polluting their language
The Telegraph ^ | February 7, 2011 | Kath Hinton

Posted on 02/07/2011 5:08:46 AM PST by NCjim

After mangling our language for years, Americans are complaining about the invasion of traditional British lingo, says Kath Hinton.

New Yorkers always fall for a nice English accent: whenever my well-spoken sister-in-law visits, they trill at her flowing diction and faultless vowels. Coming from Liverpool, I have a trickier time. In fact, I stopped ordering butter after three waiters in one smart restaurant failed to grasp my pronunciation. "Bootta! Bootta!" I pleaded, while my American friends wept with joy at my embarrassment.

Now, however, it is the words we Anglo-Saxons use, not how we say them, that is causing a stir. After mangling our language for years, Americans are complaining about their own dialect being polluted by "Britishisms".

New Yorker Ben Yagoda, a professor at Delaware University, is studying the invasion of traditional British lingo. He has set up a website to keep track of the wicked, uniquely British words such as "kerfuffle" or "amidst" that are creeping into everyday American usage.

Yagoda's biggest objection, he tells me, is to words for which there are "perfectly good American equivalents, like 'bits' for 'parts' and 'on holiday' instead of 'on vacation' ". They are, he says, "purely pretentious".

Of course, British English has been under assault from this side of the Atlantic for centuries. America's most notorious linguistic anarchist, Noah Webster, decided more than 200 years ago that the English couldn't spell, decreeing that theatre should become theater; favour, favor; jewellery, jewelry; and so on.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: british; english; expats; grammar; tiddler; tittingoffagain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last
To: NCjim
I should say that English varies throughout England. "Brit" usually means Londoner (and I don't mean Cockney.)

Has anyone noticed that a Massachusetter trying to speak Brit English sounds like a Liverpudlian? Also of note: Scots trying to deracinate their accent sound Canadian.

101 posted on 02/07/2011 7:18:05 AM PST by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Around here, 'Holiday" is liberal code speak for "Shove your religious observances where the sun don't shine and leave it there to rot".

Other than that, yea, it's a fairly regular word. Why are you fretting so much about a little buggers' charter anyway?

102 posted on 02/07/2011 7:19:03 AM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: caver

Ordinarily, I agree with your assertion. There’s nothing more pretentious than a “Shopping Centre” in the USA.....obviously, the property owner/developer is thinking that by using British spelling, he’s creating something high-class. I will however, absolutely defend H.P. Lovecraft, my all-time favorite American horror author. He was an admitted Britophile, and always used British spelling in his stories. “The Colour out of Space” just don’t have the same impact with it’s American counterpart, for me at least. So, I guess when Lovecraft did it, I’m cool with it. Other folks are just pretentious a$$h____s.


103 posted on 02/07/2011 7:33:41 AM PST by AnAmericanAbroad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanAbroad

It’s interesting that you and several others defend the use of British spelling due to their fondness of literature and poetry. Having no interest in works of fiction or poetry, I cannot agree. I read history, mostly military history.


104 posted on 02/07/2011 7:48:07 AM PST by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork
Dave, they have great food in Hungary so I take back all those things I said about you.


105 posted on 02/07/2011 7:56:57 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: caver

“whilst”. We don’t say that word yet so many iditos use it to try to sound British.


106 posted on 02/07/2011 8:03:07 AM PST by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanAbroad
OK, you just named one of my three favorite authors (H.P. Lovecraft). I'm also a major Terry Pratchett fan.

Luckliy, Robert Heinlein keeps me from being too pretentious. :-)

107 posted on 02/07/2011 8:05:06 AM PST by Jonah Hex ("To Serve Manatee" is a cookbook!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

It’s German. A college friend used to say it, and I found it in Mencken.


108 posted on 02/07/2011 8:07:51 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

British never could speak english!!!


109 posted on 02/07/2011 8:09:05 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Most of the time, to me, food it food, fuel, something to fill the hole, and I don’t really notice it unless it’s exceptionally good, or exceptionally bad. I thought the roast lamb, which we eat pretty regularly at home, was exceptional, as was the beef wellington, which is my all time favorite.

And the tea rooms in the US cannot seem to get the scones and clotted cream right.


110 posted on 02/07/2011 8:10:34 AM PST by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

And when did hooded sweatshirts become “hoodies”?


111 posted on 02/07/2011 8:13:36 AM PST by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer

“... the cashier says that the rubbers are in the pharmacy section”.

Hysterical!!


112 posted on 02/07/2011 8:14:50 AM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

I like to tease my British friends by saying that I’m surprised we didn’t leave earlier.


113 posted on 02/07/2011 8:29:02 AM PST by jda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller; nathanbedford

Some English food is great, and breakfast was my favorite meal there (for dinner we always had Indian). Grilled tomato half, toast standing up in the toast holder so it stays crisp, thick somewhat tough bacon . . . and mutton chops, which you can’t get here unless you pay $35 at a restaurant like Keen’s. Sausages at the cafeteria. Cornish pasties.

Of course when they try to do American food they are hopeless. Cheeseburgers with the cheese not melted.

Possibly some of this has changed since I was there. I know there was a foodie revolution there in the eighties.


114 posted on 02/07/2011 8:32:01 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: MaryFromMichigan
drop the "the" as in "going to the hospital"

That one bothers me too. It's a Canadian thing also so we Michiganders are likely to hear that a lot.

115 posted on 02/07/2011 8:37:44 AM PST by stayathomemom (Beware of cat attacks while typing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Stingray51; firebrand
And when did hooded sweatshirts become “hoodies”?

About the same time "gourmet" became "foodie".

116 posted on 02/07/2011 8:37:50 AM PST by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

Those two words have different meanings to me. The foodie revolution was when young, ordinary, nongourmet folks started getting into food. The eighties. Gourmets we have had with us for a long time.


117 posted on 02/07/2011 8:44:20 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Miss_Meyet; jla

Yummm.


118 posted on 02/07/2011 9:14:40 AM PST by stayathomemom (Beware of cat attacks while typing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

I understand there is a difference, but “foodie”, “hoodie”, the ‘90s term “hottie” (for men) are all diminutive nouns. Their usage usually is meant as a subtle put-down of the item or person in question (compare to the ‘70s “trekkie” vs. “trekker” debate), or the superiority of the user over the said item.


119 posted on 02/07/2011 9:21:18 AM PST by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Being from the South, standing “on line” always struck me as wrong. You stand in line, not on line. I think that’s a New York deal however, so there you go.


120 posted on 02/07/2011 9:39:32 AM PST by alarm rider (The left will always tell you who they fear the most. What are they telling you now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson