[WinOne4TheGipper]

They are literally telling us WHAT is real now. With no evidence, no backup, no information. Just shut up and believe what they say.

Um, hello? Isn't that what Birthers do all the time? Challenge them to prove that one bit of what they're saying is true and they will yell at you about being an obot, or hating the constitution. Then they'll demand that you prove that Obama was born in Hawaii, when they're making an allegation that he was not. Then what little proof they do offer to back themselves up either proves to be complete garbage or a twisting of the words of someone who wasn't present at the birth in the first place.

[cycle of discernment]

OK.

Present a solid, evidence-based counter argument why this “president” has hidden so much of his background.

I,for one, am all ears.

[Stentor]

Um, hello? Isn't that what Birthers do all the time?

So you've seen his birth certificate. I feel much better. I'm not a birther. I'm a hatched out under a flat rocker.

[surfer]

For me...I just think we are entitled to know anything we want to know about the person who carries the nuclear football with him...

This President has gone way beyond any reasonable amount of effort to hide an enormous amount of information from his past including his voting record while in the state senate.

Ironically he had no problem being involved with the release of personal divorce records of his challenger in the IL race which propelled on the scene.

He is hiding something and it is something big...what is it - who knows but I believe we have a right to know especially from the man that said he was going to offer the highest level of transparency.

[MichaelCorleone]

Your logic is faulty.

So-called birthers are calling for Obama to come up with a simple document that even a minor has to when he/she opens up a bank account.

The burden of proof is on Obama, not the ‘birthers’.

Obama has spent literally millions hiding relevant information the the American people who. incidentally, have every right to know, and could prove beyond any doubt he is who he says he is.

How some birthers ‘act’ or what some birthers say in defense of their position is irrelevant to the issue. Not only is there no proof of a BC, but there's ample anecdotal evidence BHO is not eligible to hold this office. Finally, I'm sure you know that if this were Bush or Reagan or Dole the media (including O'Reily) would hammer away at this until the BC was produced or there was a resignation.

[melancholy]

I now know the Gipper you refer to in your screen name.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2672330/posts

Win one for the ghoster who wants to see 0h0m0llah’s education records to peel this ghost of a POTUS as the rotten onion he really is.

You won’t answer anyway. Throw something called a post that you don’t intend to answer and run away.