Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. House votes against ethanol-expansion funding
The Wichita Eagle ^ | Feb. 22, 2011 | DAN VOORHIS

Posted on 02/22/2011 10:17:07 AM PST by george76

The ethanol industry took a shot on Saturday when the U.S. House of Representatives voted to remove funding for the expansion of ethanol in vehicle fuel.

The House voted 285-136 on a measure that blocks the Environmental Protection Agency from raising the cap on ethanol from 10 percent to 15 percent.

The House also voted 261-185 to remove EPA funding to help pay for the special pumps needed to dispense higher blends of ethanol at gas stations.

The measures are part of the House's much larger budget resolution and must survive budget negotiations with the Senate and get a signature from President Obama before they become law. The Senate is considered more supportive of ethanol in part because farm state representation is stronger there.

(Excerpt) Read more at kansas.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: corn; cornpimps; drillbabydrill; energy; ethanol; expansion; fakegas; gas; oil; thorium
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Minus_The_Bear

“Iowa has a primary” REALLY and JUST WHEN is the “Iowa Primary”?! We (Iowa)have a CAUCUS!


21 posted on 02/22/2011 10:58:46 AM PST by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
OH and NE,SD,IL,IN,OH,MO,MN,WI,MI are not???

Man, I'm feeling slighted. How could you miss CA, the squealingest pig at the teet?

22 posted on 02/22/2011 11:03:25 AM PST by The Citizen Soldier (Obama: All turban, no camels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: george76

“The ethanol industry took a shot”

Good metaphor. Archer Daniels Midland and the rest of these greaseballs have been hooked on govt handouts like some drug addict.

A shot at reality is the right ticket.


23 posted on 02/22/2011 11:03:41 AM PST by bestintxas (Somewhere in Kenya, a Village is missing its Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Make the farmers work for the money and actually farm.

Chuckle.

I'll bet you haven't even been on a farm, let alone know a farmer. You wouldn't spout such nonsense if you did.

24 posted on 02/22/2011 11:07:19 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

Try finding a non-ethanol gas station around where you live.

One of my friends drive 30,000 miles per year running the non-ethanol gas. He’s saving $900 per year. That’s counting the increased MPGs running on the non-ethanol gas and also accounting for the more expensive price of non-ethanol gas compared to the 10% mix.

People across this country don’t realize that they are paying about $1,000 more per year with the decreased Miles Per Gallon from 10% ethanol mixed gas.


25 posted on 02/22/2011 11:21:39 AM PST by jq2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

LOL, actually the Little women has fifty angus cows, she let’s me pet one now and then. But I was up in indiana a while back and was shocked at the number of cattle barns and pins falling down, but every sq inch of land around them was set to plant more corn. It came to me these turkeys are renting their land and collecting their government checks instead of working. And since the republican don’t have the stones to kill the program, I thought a weaning process may work.


26 posted on 02/22/2011 11:23:12 AM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

LOL, actually the Little women has fifty angus cows, she let’s me pet one now and then. But I was up in indiana a while back and was shocked at the number of cattle barns and pins falling down, but every sq inch of land around them was set to plant more corn. It came to me these turkeys are renting their land and collecting their government checks instead of working. And since the republican don’t have the stones to kill the program, I thought a weaning process may work.


27 posted on 02/22/2011 11:23:37 AM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: george76

Good. Now vote for drill baby drill.


28 posted on 02/22/2011 11:29:48 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
There have been too many instances of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, as though actually slaying a rampaging dragon, now pulled down to the ground, would be bad form for a knight.

I keep hearing this over and over again but I cannot for the life of me think of a single instance where what you say is true. Give me an example of where Republicans have had the political power to "win" and have backed off from victory? I think this is something that's repeated over an over again so that in the minds of many it's true when it really isn't true. So give me some examples.
29 posted on 02/22/2011 11:32:08 AM PST by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jq2

I found some ethanol-free gas over the weekend. I filled up my 69 Mustang and it runs better than it has in the past two years. Ethanol gasoline blend simply won’t burn right in an old car like mine. I also filled up my lawnmower can and started my mower up for the first time since last fall. It also runs much better.


30 posted on 02/22/2011 11:37:21 AM PST by CobraJet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

How about - Republicans Rebuke Effort to Defund Health Care Law | 2/15/2011 | Chad Pergram | http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2673880/posts
There is no provision more onerous to conservatives than the health law. So if the GOP is set to cut spending, why not shave the money set aside to implement the health law, too?

Rep. Steve King (R-IA) planned to do just that, which would in turn cripple all government operations devoted to executing the health law. In other words, if there’s no money, the government can’t carry out the policy.

And that’s when King ran into a buzz saw run by Virginia Foxx and the rest of the Republicans on the House Rules Committee.


31 posted on 02/22/2011 11:41:24 AM PST by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

Here’s one. ***The Manager’s Amendment*** (SA 4188), offered by Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. The Manager’s Amendment made many minor changes to S. 2611, none of have significant numeric impacts on the overall bill. However, the Manager’s Amendment included a provision that requires consultation with the government of Mexico concerning the construction of additional fencing and related border security structures along the international border between the United States and Mexico. This would virtually guarantee that the fence along the U.S.-Mexico border would never be completed. The Manager’s Amendment passed by a vote of 56 to 41.

http://profiles.numbersusa.com/improfile.php3?DistSend=CA&VIPID=46


32 posted on 02/22/2011 11:45:58 AM PST by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dixie Yooper

He dang sure did and I lost about $13,000 invested in Farmer’s Coop bonds. That was back when I couldn’t write a check for that much. Best loss I ever took and one of the best investment lessons ever learned.

Investments that won’t make money without a subsidy aren’t investments worth making.


33 posted on 02/22/2011 12:00:49 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (Half the people are below average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Amagi; mmanager; Fiddlstix; Fractal Trader; FrPR; enough_idiocy; meyer; Normandy; Whenifhow; ...
Thanx Amagi !

 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

34 posted on 02/22/2011 12:15:46 PM PST by steelyourfaith ("Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." -- Wendell Phillips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

“Who wins this clean energy race,” Mr. Zhao of Sunzone said, “really depends on how much support the government gives.”

Here’s China http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/09/business/global/09trade.html?pagewanted=3&_r=2&th&emc=th And us. The BlueGreen Alliance Foundation organization dedicated to research and education about the job-creating potential of global warming solutions and other environmental investments. BGAF works with the BlueGreen Alliance to achieve its mission. The BlueGreen Alliance is a national partnership of labor unions and environmental organizations dedicated to expanding the number and quality of jobs in the green economy, and includes the United Steelworkers, Sierra Club, Communications Workers of America, Natural Resources Defense Council, Service Employees International Union, Laborers’ International Union of America, Utility Workers Union of America, American Federation of Teachers, Amalgamated Transit Union and the Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association.

Guess who wins?

Any wonder we outsource? Meanwhile, Germany plans to build 27 coal-fired plants by 2020. Italy plans to increase its reliance on coal from 14% today to 33% in just five years. In Europe, 40 new major coal power plants are set to be built.
And Obama admits he wants to bankrupt the coal industry, and that his energy policies will cause consumers’ electricity rates to “skyrocket.”
http://blog.heritage.org/2008/11/03/morning-bell-he-left-the-truth-in-san-francisco/print/


35 posted on 02/22/2011 12:36:44 PM PST by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
"There have been too many instances of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, as though actually slaying a rampaging dragon, now pulled down to the ground, would be bad form for a knight."

I keep hearing this over and over again but I cannot for the life of me think of a single instance where what you say is true. Give me an example of where Republicans have had the political power to "win" and have backed off from victory? I think this is something that's repeated over an over again so that in the minds of many it's true when it really isn't true. So give me some examples.

Uh, I never said anything like that in this thread (and certainly not in Post #18). But I'll bite anyway - the RINOs in the Senate caved into Bill Clinton and the anti-gun Dems in passing both the Brady Bill and also the "Assault Weapons Ban" in the mid-'90s. There are seemingly ALWAYS 3 or 4 RINO Senators that vote with the Dems and really let some screwball laws get passed.

But, again, I never said any such thing in this thread.

36 posted on 02/22/2011 1:16:48 PM PST by Ancesthntr (Tyrant: "Spartans, lay down your weapons." Free man: "Persian, come and get them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

What you obviously don’t know is that the farmers are less and less dependant on “The Cheap Food for Consumers Programs”, most often referred to as “The Farm Subsidies Program”. They are less dependant on the subsidies than they have been in decades.

And the working farmers are liking it. Consumers aren’t particularly happy, but the farmers are, they are finally getting a fair return for their labor, investment, and their risk taking.


37 posted on 02/22/2011 1:22:14 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Yes and the corn growning farmers are doing just as I said.
38 posted on 02/22/2011 1:24:20 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
4. We can use Nuclear Power to generate the electricity we need and then take the coal and natural gas that are being wasted in the production of electricity and substitute it for transportation fuels.

We should start using Thorium to power reactors. We only use uranium because we needed to produce weapons-grade U-235 and Plutonium, not because it really made any sense. Thorium is far more abundant, cannot be made into a bomb and produces less radiation. In fact, the Thorium that is in coal actually has more energy than the coal itself - if put through a reactor. As it is, it is merely part of the tailings and viewed as being very harmful waste.

39 posted on 02/22/2011 1:39:38 PM PST by Ancesthntr (Tyrant: "Spartans, lay down your weapons." Free man: "Persian, come and get them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

He could but under our constitution, people who don’t want government to do something always have the upper hand over those who do. Obama can’t make them vote for it.


40 posted on 02/22/2011 6:37:56 PM PST by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson