Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Research needed-Soetoro Birth Announcement
vanity-research | February 27, 2011 | Chatter4

Posted on 02/27/2011 7:57:21 AM PST by chatter4

Just a wild thought, but, do we have any Freepers in Hawaii or Washington, DC area, that could check the Hawaiian newspapers, to see if there was a birth announcement for Maya Soetoro? She is the maternal half-sister of Barack Obama. She was born August 15, 1970 in Jakarta, Indonesia. Although I have never see an image of the document, it has been claimed that she too has a Hawaiian COLB. I understand that the newspaper announcements are certainly not proof of a Hawaiian birth or of Obama's eligiblity for office, however, if it could be shown that Maya's birth was also announced in the Hawaiian papers, that would certainly turn a few heads, seeing how the newspapers claim they get their information from the Hawaii Health Department.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; corruption; fraud; naturalborncitizen; obama; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: Yaelle

“No need to go that route. Butterdezillion has plenty of proof that the birth announcements in the papers for Obama were tampered with.”

Yes, I have read those articles-some of that evidence is quite good. What is really needed is an original print copy, but, such a find is unlikely. I was just hoping that if there was any truth at all that Hawaii issued COLB for Maya, there would be birth announcements too. It would certainly help reach those that have such a poor understanding of the Obama eligiblity issue. Thanks for your input.


21 posted on 02/27/2011 9:46:12 AM PST by chatter4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: chatter4

One thing that I find puzzling and troubling is why are there announcements in 2 papers? Also why has the birth announcements been at the forefront of the so-called proof accepted by most “journalists”? To me rather than accept the absurd false premise that it is ludicrous to think that these were planted to allow Obama to be president, a more logical reason is that it is an attempt to get the benefits of American citizenship. (They weren’t thinking about presidency - that is the red herring that the press falsely clings to)

I have given this issue some thought and I have a suggestion for some Freeper in Hawaii that might want to spend a few hours in the library and take a little research and get hard facts surrounding the birth announcements for Obama. Maybe there is something right under our noses that can easily be obtained from the newspaper archives. Here is my idea for research.

1. Search the Hawaii newspaper archives and get the birth notices for a week before and a week after Obama’s notice.

2. Count how many birth notices in each newspaper and count how many appear in both. Create a scorecard tallying the totals by day and in total. Is there anything strange about announcements in 2 papers?

3. Look at the wording - are there any other identical to Obama’s (except of course names and other specifics). Is there a pattern to Obama vs. other announcements that appear in both newspapers. Perhaps some characteristics such as they appear to be foreigners might be a common thread.

4. Search the 2 newspapers (prior to the date of the Obama notice) for any articles surrounding suggestions to make yourself an American citizen. Perhaps someone suggested the idea of the birth announcements and maybe wrote up a sample obituary.

The goals of this is to produce 100% factual document that addresses these birth announcements. I cannot stress it enough that to be effective we cannot deviate from 100% provable facts. The key is to refute a key explanation by facts. If this can be done - we can get this message through FR.

To maximize the impact if something shows up, one other important fact (not speculation) is needed along with this. That is we need to identify exactly where and what circumstances the COLB is not accepted. (This is more effective discussion than getting into differences between a COLB and a long form birth certificate which is tuned out by many people.)

I would be glad to assist in compiling the data if I had copies of the birth announcement pages in the papers.


22 posted on 02/27/2011 10:00:18 AM PST by TakeChargeBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TakeChargeBob

I would add to that needed research, his sister Maya Soetoro with birth date around August 15, 1970.


23 posted on 02/27/2011 10:24:10 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Obama and the left are making a mockery of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TakeChargeBob

Thanks. Most of what you suggest has already been done. Here is a great article about it.
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth/


24 posted on 02/27/2011 10:25:44 AM PST by chatter4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

And, only time and realty will shut up the current, but likely not future, O’Reilly lovers... expect for you Bill.


25 posted on 02/27/2011 10:25:44 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Obama and the left are making a mockery of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

The no-spin-zone O’Reilly should have stuck it out with his ballet lessons.


26 posted on 02/27/2011 10:32:50 AM PST by chatter4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
I find that most O'Reilly haters really do not even know what is on his shows. The react to web sites that quote him out of context in order to get hits from dudes that are too lazy to think for themselves.

OTOH, there are also the haters that are really just spamming because they think their feeble spams will knock O'Reilly from the #1 spot and bump their 'guy' to #1.

27 posted on 02/27/2011 10:38:21 AM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

I used to like him, but put two and two together to realize he only cares about Bill, ratings and getting interviews from Obama.

Sadly, I wish I could have back all the lost hours I spent watching him.


28 posted on 02/27/2011 10:41:47 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Obama and the left are making a mockery of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac
btw, I think fox could put just about anyone in his time slot and maintain that #1 rating. My vote is for Megyn Kelly.

Conservative and much better to look at than Bill Obama.

29 posted on 02/27/2011 10:43:53 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Obama and the left are making a mockery of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

Unacceptable:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2649455/posts?page=186


30 posted on 02/27/2011 10:49:53 AM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: All

Not only are there anomalies with the birth announcements, it has been proven that obama Sr. never lived at that address. I have to wonder how “evidence” that has been proven to be partially fraudulent can be held up as “proof”. I have copies of the Polk Directories from the Honolulu Library, and the old phone books as well (haven’t posted the phone book scans on my blog yet). Obama Sr,’s collage records never listed him at the birth announcement address either.

Here is another anomaly. If there wasn’t something weird attached to every single piece of evidence of obama’s birth records - we wouldn’t be talking about obama’s birth. Some of you may have seen this, most haven’t. It was collected at my request while a researcher was in the Honolulu Dept. of Health in July. We are the only people that have discovered this little curiosity. That’s what can happen when the work is carried out in person.
Anyway, have a look at the scan, it’s a very brief post - I had the same image up in a much longer post that I did months ago.

http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2011/01/26/duplicitous-duplicate/


31 posted on 02/27/2011 10:53:46 AM PST by Ladysforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

I will give her a second chance. She hasn’t done as much attacking of the Constitutionalists as BOR has.


32 posted on 02/27/2011 10:54:04 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Obama and the left are making a mockery of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
I will give her a second chance.You think she will change her mind?
33 posted on 02/27/2011 10:57:14 AM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

So far, I don’t see here as a Bill “finger in the wind” O’Reilly type. Plus, she seems more interested in truth, than Bill is.


34 posted on 02/27/2011 10:59:22 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Obama and the left are making a mockery of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

“Nothing will shut up the O’Reilly haters.”

No we just see O’Reilly for who he is. I hope you don’t really think he’s “looking out for the folks”.

I stood in line for 45 minutes to get him to sign his first book “The O’Reilly Factor” and he acted like he could hardly be bothered. Maybe he was tired. Maybe he’s a jerk. You be the judge.

Oh, by the way He would love to exert a little “gun control” over some of those weapons you are so wild for. He’s for gun confiscation in Hurricanes. He thinks its constitutional. How ya like him now? Just lookin out for the folks.


35 posted on 02/27/2011 11:03:45 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: Georgia Girl 2
No we just see O’Reilly for who he is. I hope you don’t really think he’s “looking out for the folks”.

If you are searching for a media type that is 'looking out for you', you are in for a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNG search.

37 posted on 02/27/2011 12:01:41 PM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

>Oh, by the way He would love to exert a little “gun control” over some of those weapons you are so wild for.<

Please listen to this. Thank you.

O’Reilly says liberals who support gun control are “today’s totalitarians,” compares to Hitler

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201003020053


38 posted on 02/27/2011 12:05:01 PM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

>Oh, by the way He would love to exert a little “gun control” over some of those weapons you are so wild for.<

Please listen to this. Thank you.

O’Reilly says liberals who support gun control are “today’s totalitarians,” compares to Hitler

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201003020053


39 posted on 02/27/2011 12:05:13 PM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

“If you are searching for a media type that is ‘looking out for you’, you are in for a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNG search.”

I’m glad you snapped out of it. Now watch BOR’s 60 minutes interview where he wants to take your gun away during a hurricane when I’m guessing you might just need it most.


40 posted on 02/27/2011 12:26:36 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson