Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: InvisibleChurch

Were I a prosecutor, I would sorta make it known that I considered the protests to be conduct that would provoke a reasonable person to commit a battery on the protestors....


3 posted on 03/02/2011 8:35:10 AM PST by henkster (Before we make any more "investments" we ought to be shown the prospectus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: henkster

From Wikipedia:

The fighting words doctrine, in United States constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In its 9-0 decision, Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942), the U.S. Supreme Court established the doctrine and held that “insulting or ‘fighting words,’ those that by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace” are among the “well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech [that] the prevention and punishment of...have never been thought to raise any constitutional problem.”


8 posted on 03/02/2011 8:41:30 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson