Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Detects Radiation 60 Miles From Stricken Plant
nytimes.com ^ | March 13, 2011 | DAVID E. SANGER and MATTHEW L. WALD

Posted on 03/13/2011 7:01:08 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

WASHINGTON — As the scale of Japan’s nuclear crisis begins to come to light, experts in Japan and the United States say the country is now facing a cascade of accumulating problems that suggest that radioactive releases of steam from the crippled plants could go on for weeks or even months.

The emergency flooding of two stricken reactors with seawater and the resulting steam releases are a desperate step intended to avoid a much bigger problem: a full meltdown of the nuclear cores in two reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. So far, Japanese officials have said the melting of the nuclear cores in the two plants is assumed to be “partial,” and the amount of radioactivity measured outside the plants, though twice the level Japan considers safe, has been relatively modest.

But Pentagon officials reported Sunday that helicopters flying 60 miles from the plant picked up small amounts of radioactive particulates — still being analyzed, but presumed to include Cesium-137 and Iodine-121 — suggesting widening environmental contamination. In a country where memories of a nuclear horror of a different sort in the last days of World War II weigh heavily on the national psyche and national politics, the impact of continued venting of long-lasting radioactivity from the plants is hard to overstate.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bwr; fukushima
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 03/13/2011 7:01:12 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
But Pentagon officials reported Sunday that helicopters flying 60 miles from the plant picked up small amounts of radioactive particulates — still being analyzed, but presumed to include Cesium-137 and Iodine-121 — suggesting widening environmental contamination.

What a pantload. If I remember right 97% of radioactive particles come from natural sources. This article has taken fearmongering to a new level.

2 posted on 03/13/2011 7:03:30 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Now I’m getting worried. Damn NYT.


3 posted on 03/13/2011 7:03:32 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (They don't need to do another 911. They have BHO and the Fleebaggers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
the impact of continued venting of long-lasting radioactivity from the plants is hard to overstate.

Yet, the New York Times will do all it can to overstate the impact.....

4 posted on 03/13/2011 7:05:52 PM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

I don’t care what anyone here says.

Three countries I had planned on going to within the next couple of years - Morocco, Egypt and Japan are now off my list.


5 posted on 03/13/2011 7:06:49 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
In a country where memories of a nuclear horror of a different sort in the last days of World War II weigh heavily on the national psyche and national politics, the impact of continued venting of long-lasting radioactivity from the plants is hard to overstate.

The NYT is such a drama queen! If the Japanese really felt this way, I doubt that they would have built the reactors in the first place.

6 posted on 03/13/2011 7:09:44 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (Obama promised a gold mine, but will give us the shaft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

GE designed the plant in Japan
http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/03/13/6256121-general-electric-designed-reactors-in-fukushima-have-23-sisters-in-us


7 posted on 03/13/2011 7:09:44 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Here’s the latest report from Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO):

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/11031312-e.html


8 posted on 03/13/2011 7:12:31 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (Obama promised a gold mine, but will give us the shaft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Yeah I was just thinking of high school science and the teacher putting a geiger counter near my arm and detecting radiation.


9 posted on 03/13/2011 7:12:37 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

That Cockroach Whorealdo is on carping about Chernobyl,That brain dead America hating Fool.


10 posted on 03/13/2011 7:12:49 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Yes this will cut down on tourism, too. Sad.


11 posted on 03/13/2011 7:13:37 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (They don't need to do another 911. They have BHO and the Fleebaggers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
The Grey Lady doing her whorish best. So bad I'm surprised she has customers, but there is no accounting for leftist tastes.

Whenever I see somebody reading the NYT, I think "Useful Fool" and "Deluded."

12 posted on 03/13/2011 7:15:06 PM PDT by Clint Williams (America -- a great idea, didn't last. The only reasonable response to jihad is Crusade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Radiation is rather ubiquitous in modern societies, even smoke alarms. Dig the people out first IMO


13 posted on 03/13/2011 7:15:47 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

a beeber like device?


14 posted on 03/13/2011 7:16:28 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom!!! <sarc>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
What a pantload. If I remember right 97% of radioactive particles come from natural sources. This article has taken fearmongering to a new level.

The word was "particulates," not particles. What they're basically talking about here, is radioactive fallout.

Most of which does not come from natural sources.

15 posted on 03/13/2011 7:16:41 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Three countries I had planned on going to within the next couple of years - Morocco, Egypt and Japan are now off my list.

Stick with Mexico. It's closer.

16 posted on 03/13/2011 7:17:47 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: al baby

A big brown beeber.


17 posted on 03/13/2011 7:20:09 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I think the fact that we can detect radiation 60 miles from the plant has more to do with the sensitivity of our military gear than the severity of the leak. Just because the best radiation-detecting gear that money can buy can detect it does not mean that there is a danger even within 100 yards of the plant.


18 posted on 03/13/2011 7:23:02 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
The word was "particulates," not particles. What they're basically talking about here, is radioactive fallout.
Most of which does not come from natural sources.

Exactly. But they're linking this to the plant. I'm betting you capture small amounts of particulates anywhere on earth.

19 posted on 03/13/2011 7:30:43 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
Exactly. But they're linking this to the plant. I'm betting you capture small amounts of particulates anywhere on earth.

I'm betting the DoD knows the difference. More to the point, they've got an "edge" of sorts for the detection. It's not natural.

20 posted on 03/13/2011 7:37:48 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson