Okay, then let me ask you this. The earthquake was initially thought to be very close to that exact spot. Why would you position one of your most valued assets right over a few days old 9.0 fault line?
Then you add in the wind current, the nuclear plant problem, and you can’t come up with a better position than that? Seriously?
Do they think this is Obama’s bath tub, and gee wouldn’t it be nice to see what happens if...
Strange!
I don't know for a fact, but I'd imagine that an aircraft carrier afloat over a 9.0 earthquake probably wouldn't experience much more than a little extra bobbing.
I could be wrong, of course.
Why would you position one of your most valued assets right over a few days old 9.0 fault line?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Its the safest place, the future tectonic movement will be along the fault line in a Southwesterly direction along the Sendai, Tokyo, Nagano fault line.Any Tsunamis would be generated Westward of the Reagans position.