Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn
Not to be a smart ass, because I do hate to see this happen to anyone but didn't we leave a whole lot of radiation after we nuked them?

And before you flame me, I can't help wonder what the remaining WWII vets think about our Navy “Helping”

And/or how many Americans know what political party the President was in when we dropped those bombs...

BTW - I'm glad he did and we should be proud.

33 posted on 03/14/2011 9:48:35 PM PDT by Driver32 (I like airplane noise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Driver32

They’ll recover from the nuclear portion of the disaster just fine. Hiroshima and Nagasaki individually were far worse than the worst-case scenario for that N-plant. It’s the shattered infrastructure, over 10,000 dead, and the possibility of another big earthquake during the recovery itself that is a far greater threat.

If this had happened in 2020 instead of 2011 they would’ve had the much safer planned reactors 7 & 8 on-line and the 30-40 year-old reactors 1-4 would’ve been already defueled and getting dismantled.


37 posted on 03/14/2011 10:18:19 PM PDT by neutronsgalore (ROPERS DELENDA EST!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Driver32

Honestly, what the remaining WWII vets think isn’t relevant to the current political interests of the United States. Not that I expect the current president to act in those interests, but the United States, today, has tremendous areas of overlapping security interests and concerns with the japanese. You have to be blind not to be able to read a map and see where the major security threats to both of us in asia are coming from.

Yes, a democrat dropped the bomb. Not sure what political affiliation has to do with anything so far in the past. Democrats of the 40’s were more conservative than todays republican party. Comparing obama and truman is a laughable exercise, but the joke is on us!

Yes, bombing japan saved countless lives of US soldiers in the bloodbath that home island invasion would have been, and probably saved more japanese lives to boot, though that wasn’t the motivation for it. Only people ignorant of the actual history or unable to get around their nuclear or anti-american neuroses would argue against the use of the bombs. There do appear to be quite a few such people, though. I cannot see how not using the bomb would have benefited either the US or Japan (post-defeat) in any sense whatsoever, and I have wondered about what additional territory Stalin would have been able to annex/acquire/liberate in such a scenario.

As far as radiation, yes, hydrogen bombs caused radiation but it was VERY short-lived, from what I have read. If you were nearby, you died of it, but it was at vastly lower levels pretty quickly. The cities were rebuilt pretty much where they were before as far as I can tell (I have driven close to but not through nagasaki), which says a lot.


38 posted on 03/14/2011 10:34:21 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson