Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sprite518; JohnKinAK; indylindy; brent13a; stuartcr; Former Proud Canadian; Repeal 16-17; ...
Well it’s on Top of the Drudge Report. What’s Mr. MIT expertise in since he is saying what you want to hear.

But of course, Matt Drudge is not offering expert authoritative advice either, he's also just reposting other anonymously written headlines in order to grab clicks.

"Radiation 'directly' into the atmosphere" meaning what?

If you posted a report that someone in Oregon was spewing water "directly into the air" with a water sprinkler, must I automatically assume it's a flood threat to Texas?

32 posted on 03/15/2011 1:17:22 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sam_paine

It means radioactive particles (alpha, beta, gamma emitters) have been released to the atmosphere. No one is suggesting people in Texas panic. But if I were in Japan I would take all necessary precautions for my family no matter what some MIT “academic” says. Everybody pings on the media, but “academics” aren’t much better..........OBAMA is an “academic” for Heavan’s sake.


38 posted on 03/15/2011 1:20:58 PM PDT by JohnKinAK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: sam_paine
My earlier post referred to "dozens" of atmospheric tests. The actual number is over 600 atmospheric tests. Each one giving off more radiation than this reactor will.

We're all going to die, this accident won't be the cause.

99 posted on 03/15/2011 2:13:02 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson