Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Thread- Fukushima Reactors

Posted on 03/16/2011 6:25:47 AM PDT by hc87

Live Thread for March 16, 2011. Please post Fukushima reactors stories here.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Japan
KEYWORDS: fukushima; japaneathquake; japannuclearplants; nuclear; radiation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-297 next last
Please post Fukushima reactors stories here.
1 posted on 03/16/2011 6:25:55 AM PDT by hc87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hc87

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/17/world/asia/17nuclear.html?_r=1


2 posted on 03/16/2011 6:28:53 AM PDT by hc87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hc87

You mean they’re all still there ???
Shep Smith will be disappointed ...


3 posted on 03/16/2011 6:35:28 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hc87

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/16/latest-updates-on-japans-nuclear-crisis-and-earthquake-aftermath-3/

Steve Herman
The peak hourly reading today in Fukushima-shi equaled 1/2 a chest X-ray.
23 minutes ago

ReutersBreakingNews
Japan nuclear safety agency: radiation levels outside Daiichi plant spiked about noon but fell back
26 minutes ago.

Steve Herman
According to latest rad data, folks in Fukushima City were exposed to a spike of radiation 500x above the typical background level.
31 minutes ago


4 posted on 03/16/2011 6:35:40 AM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hc87
Quick question. An article was posted last night that showed that radioactive decay would continue to produce .5% of the original reactor power for at least ten days after the reactor was shut down. Since that determines the amount of cooling the reactors need it would seem to be important. How many MW of heat did those reactors produce at peak power. And how much heat does it take to break containment. Get those numbers and we don't need speculation, just mathematics to figure out where this is going.
5 posted on 03/16/2011 6:38:13 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hc87

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2689114/posts


6 posted on 03/16/2011 6:39:07 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

I understand all four reactors are each rated in the 400-500 megawatt output range.


7 posted on 03/16/2011 6:45:17 AM PDT by CarryaBigStick (My office is an Airtractor 402)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hc87

BUMP


8 posted on 03/16/2011 6:47:11 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

That I have read, and it would be nice if an expert could verify or debunk, is that these type of reactors produce 7% of the production energy (heat) once shutdown. And require 1 ro 3 years of active cooling. Certain hope that is not true, the info comes from wiki so one never knows.


9 posted on 03/16/2011 6:50:14 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

•NEWS ADVISORY: Water injection into ponds at No. 3, No. 4 reactors priority: agency (22:32)
•NEWS ADVISORY: Spent fuel pool at No. 3 reactor heated, emitting steam: nuke agency (22:27)

and there you have it...there is indeed a spent fuel rod pool there at #3 too(was thought all the rods were in 4)..how much damage did that huge exoplsion do to the pool..are the rods still in the correct positions or are they touching each other now is the question


10 posted on 03/16/2011 6:50:42 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CarryaBigStick

Megawatts electical output is not reactor heat, which is what he is looking for. Further, I understand that residual heat is in the 3 percent range for some time. Could be wrong though.


11 posted on 03/16/2011 6:51:24 AM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hc87
http://resources.nei.org/documents/japan/Used_Fuel_Pools_Key_Facts.pdf
12 posted on 03/16/2011 6:53:12 AM PDT by CarryaBigStick (My office is an Airtractor 402)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

NRC lists the megawatt thermal (MWt) ratings for operating US reactors. Dresden 1 and 2 are GE Mark 1 BWR - apparently similar to the Fukushima Daiichi plant.

They are rated at 2957 MWt. However, I’m not sure this is a useful comparison, since the figure listed is an operating rating - basically an upper limit of the licensed power for the plant.

With a loss of core structural integrity, loss of the geometry, loss of moderator control, I’m not sure we can calculate with any degree of confidence how much heat the plant will produce in its current state, at least not without a lot of data that even the plant operators themselves are struggling to determine.

If it were just a matter of the reactor being scrammed, all rods in place, all systems normal, then yes we could I’m sure reasonably estimate how much decay heat will be produced. Right now, there are just too many wildcards for that sort of computation.

But then, I’m not a nuclear engineer.


13 posted on 03/16/2011 6:54:03 AM PDT by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon

The past few hours some in japans goverment have said the radiation is now below the level to cause harm to humans....while at the same time the defense minister said the helo operation to dump water on the reactors was called off becuase of high radiation. so which is it?


14 posted on 03/16/2011 6:54:54 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hc87; P-Marlowe

Radioactive fallout downwind is scary stuff.

My basic opinion is that I’m glad that I don’t live anywhere near those Fukushma plants at this point in time.

America has enough coal to power itself for 250 years AND convert coal to liquid for powering our cars.

But, we’re not permitted to tap that resource.


15 posted on 03/16/2011 6:56:37 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain & proud of it: Truly Supporting the Troops means praying for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SargeK

Correction, Dresden 2 and 3.


16 posted on 03/16/2011 6:56:55 AM PDT by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CarryaBigStick

Here are the reactors at Fukushima Dai-Ichi:

1 × 460 MW (Unit 1 damaged)
4 × 784 MW (Units 2, 3, and 4 damaged; Unit 5 experiencing cooling problems)
1 × 1,100 MW (Unit 6 experiencing cooling problems)


17 posted on 03/16/2011 6:57:01 AM PDT by globelamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon

Megawatts output has a direct correlation to heat output of the reactor. Watts can be easily converted to BTU’s. 450,000 watts equals 25613.84 BTU/hours.


18 posted on 03/16/2011 6:58:03 AM PDT by CarryaBigStick (My office is an Airtractor 402)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hc87; coaltrain; B4Ranch; amom

I saw a thread last night about the reactors being in cold shutdown. Could someone look into this and confirm it or at least discuss it?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2689332/posts

This is the article coaltrain referenced:
http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/IT-All_Fukushima_Daini_units_in_cold_shutdown-1503114.html

From the thread another article is mentioned by B4Ranch:
http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/tsunamiupdate01.html


19 posted on 03/16/2011 6:58:23 AM PDT by TEXOKIE (Anarchy IS the strategy of the forces of darkness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarryaBigStick

Oops, BTU/minutes, not hours.


20 posted on 03/16/2011 6:59:30 AM PDT by CarryaBigStick (My office is an Airtractor 402)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-297 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson