Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aria; All

I guess Palin agreeing with the UN is nothing new...she supported the LOST treaty.

There is no need for the US to be in Libya. Whichever side you help...they are Islamic Terrorist. Palin just acting like another Liberal Globalist.

Better to defend America’s borders than someone else’s. Time for politicians to start being American and stop being Liberal Globalist


13 posted on 03/18/2011 5:52:41 AM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (Will Japan blame America for its latest nuking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: UCFRoadWarrior
I guess Palin agreeing with the UN is nothing new...

You're right about LOST, but your comment that Palin agrees with the UN on Libya is a twist in logic.

Where to begin.

1.) Palin wanted a no-fly zone three weeks ago. The UN passed the no-fly zone three weeks too late, to cover their rear ends, when it no longer matters.

2.) Palin wanted a no-fly zone regardless of what the UN wanted.

3.) If anything one could say that you agree with Chinese and the Russians on this, because they did not vote for the no-fly.

There is no need for the US to be in Libya. Whichever side you help...they are Islamic Terrorist.

We know Gadaffi is a terrorist who killed Americans. The US certainly has an interest to remove Gadaffi.

Can you document any terrorists on the other side?

14 posted on 03/18/2011 9:31:09 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson