Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leaning Right
Obama has been quite clear on this subject:

The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.

As Commander-in-Chief, the President does have a duty to protect and defend the United States. In instances of self-defense, the President would be within his constitutional authority to act before advising Congress or seeking its consent. History has shown us time and again, however, that military action is most successful when it is authorized and supported by the Legislative branch. It is always preferable to have the informed consent of Congress prior to any military action.

From Ed Driscoll quoting the Boston Globe.
78 posted on 03/19/2011 4:53:20 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TChad

The above quote is from December 20, 2007.


83 posted on 03/19/2011 4:54:41 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson