Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India, China, Russia oppose air strikes on Libya
The Deccan Herald ^

Posted on 03/20/2011 9:45:28 AM PDT by Sancho1984

India, China and Russia Sunday opposed the Western air strikes on Libya, with Moscow demanding a dialogue to end the ''bloodshed''.

The Indian foreign ministry said nothing should be done that aggravates the worsening situation for the people of Libya, where a revolt erupted in February against the four-decades rule of Muammar Gaddafi.

"India views with grave concern the continuing violence, strife and deteriorating humanitarian situation in Libya. It regrets the air strikes that are taking place," a ministry statement said.

It said the Indian government hoped that the air attacks would not lead to greater harm to innocent civilians, foreigners and diplomatic missions and their personnel still in Libya. "As stated earlier by India, the measures adopted should mitigate and not exacerbate an already difficult situation for the people of Libya."

New Delhi urged all parties "to abjure use of or the threat of use of force and to resolve their differences through peaceful means and dialogue in which the UN and regional organisations should play their roles".

Russia and China echoed similar sentiments. "Moscow notes with regret this armed action, taken in conjunction with the hastily passed UN Security Council resolution 1973," the Russian foreign ministry said Sunday.

Moscow called for an immediate end to the "bloodshed" in Libya to allow for dialogue. India, China and Russia were among five countries that Thursday abstained from voting on the UN resolution which authorised the use of force and the creation of a no-fly zone in Libya.

The Chinese foreign ministry said Beijing "as always does not agree with the use of force in international relations".

Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said China believed that all countries should respect Libya's "sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity".

"We hope stability can be restored in Libya as soon as possible so as to avoid more civilian casualties caused by the escalation of military conflict," she said.

Gaddafi has vowed to defend his country against "colonial aggression" after the first air strikes against Libyan defences and the enforcement of the UN-sanctioned no-fly zone over Libya.

China Friday said it had "serious reservations" about a part of the UN Security Council resolution that authorized a no-fly zone over Libya.

Brazil and Germany also abstained from voting on the resolution. The US, France and Britain were among 10 countries that voted in favour.

French, British and American jets and ships are targeting key targets in Libya to prevent government forces from overrunning rebels who have vowed to topple Gaddafi.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; india; jimmyqaeda2; libya; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

1 posted on 03/20/2011 9:45:30 AM PDT by Sancho1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984

They shoulda voted against it then.


2 posted on 03/20/2011 9:48:48 AM PDT by Mmogamer (I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984
India, China and Russia were among five countries that Thursday abstained from voting on the UN resolution which authorised the use of force and the creation of a no-fly zone in Libya.

Way to go, Deccan Herald.

Nicely buried.

3 posted on 03/20/2011 9:52:04 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

I was surprised they didn’t vote against it. Especially China and Russia.


4 posted on 03/20/2011 9:52:29 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

they rather abstained from voting.


5 posted on 03/20/2011 9:53:06 AM PDT by Sancho1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Guess Gaddafi isn’t anyone’s client at the moment.


6 posted on 03/20/2011 9:53:59 AM PDT by MetaThought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

“They shoulda voted against it then.”

It was a setup and a trap to sucker Obama into a war which they can then condemn.


7 posted on 03/20/2011 9:55:54 AM PDT by toomanylaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984
Opposition from India(!) I can't believe. Must be some unimportant Indian politician trying to get 2 minutes of publicity.
8 posted on 03/20/2011 9:57:35 AM PDT by R4nd0m
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984

They should file charges on Obambo and extradite him to China for trial then.


9 posted on 03/20/2011 9:58:47 AM PDT by Concho (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984
We have no business getting in the middle of a muslim civil war... both sides hate our guts.

LLS

10 posted on 03/20/2011 10:00:29 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R4nd0m

nOp!! it was Indian GOV decision not some individual politician one .


11 posted on 03/20/2011 10:00:29 AM PDT by Sancho1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer
They wanted it, but also wanted to distance themselves from attacks on Muslims, to avoid blowback. Let the US be the target of worldwide Muslim anger.

We should have stayed out and let the Arab League deal with their own issues.

12 posted on 03/20/2011 10:00:43 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Sancho1984

I don’t remember Russia seeking a U.N. resolution to allow them to ‘protect’ the civilians in South Ossetia.


14 posted on 03/20/2011 10:03:54 AM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984

15 posted on 03/20/2011 10:04:46 AM PDT by paulycy (Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer
Yes, they should have voted against it, but now with these denunciations along with the Arab League saying that the current bombing was not what they agreed to support, we are set up for the classic charge that the infidel crusaders are invading and killing Muslims and the Imams can preach hate and revenge every Friday and call forth the terrorists in the West and attacks against Christians throughout the ummah.
16 posted on 03/20/2011 10:05:31 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984

So do we, but we are being ruled by tyrants and must do as they say./ no sarc


17 posted on 03/20/2011 10:05:48 AM PDT by devistate one four (USC 10.311 Militia Kimber CDP II .45 OORAH! TET68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toomanylaws
It was a setup and a trap to sucker Obama into a war which they can then condemn.

Exactly. This is what happens when a country is lead by an amateur.

18 posted on 03/20/2011 10:13:35 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern, you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

exactly!!bullzeye we all know american economy is still recovering from financial crunch ,and you guys are still in afganistan and iraq already streching way more than what you even thought. It’s sheer waste of resources and menz out there in libya . This’s what china wants ,they want you to waste all your pile of money and resources,so they can showup their power projection in terms of economy and military after you get exhausted . I don’t know why your president act like a stupid and an idiot,can’t he simply see this ???

AN INDIAN


19 posted on 03/20/2011 10:15:32 AM PDT by Sancho1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sancho1984

So they voted ‘present’ and then opposed it? Sounds familiar.


20 posted on 03/20/2011 10:15:55 AM PDT by rintense (The GOP elite & friends can pound sand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson