So, would you agree that her letter can't be extrapolated to mean she supports the subversion of US sovereignty to the UN?
She was governor of AK, yes, but still a US citizen. Our PDSer friends would scream, "if she becomes President, she will sell us out to the UN!" How do you respond to that?
Good Lord, how many of you (backwoods-engineer) pathetic arseholes are out there?!?
Why don't you just go on over and blog with the Huff-Puff or DUmmies losers and save the FR bandwidth.
No, that is the irrational conclusion that I mentioned in the other post. One can read into LOST both support and opposition could result in subverting US sovereignty. Not ratifying it could result in land we claim being subverted by Russians who claim it due to ice cover lines versus continental shelf lines. When you get down to it, the argument in Palin's letter's specific case wasn't about subverting sovereignty but simply protecting Alaska. Like I said, this is way more complicated than some like to make it to be.
First, I have no FRIENDS that that suffer from "Palin Derangement Syndrome".
If someone does suffer from PDS, there is no point in responding, because logic won't work.
I used to respond to urine-aunt just to argue, never to win, because I knew that it couldn't be done.
Our PDSer friends would scream, “if she becomes President, she will sell us out to the UN!” How do you respond to that?’===
OBomba and H.Clinton already did.