Supreme Court Sides With People; Federal Reserve Must Tell Us Who Received Money

Somewhat Reasonable (The Heartland Institute) ^ | March 22, 2011 | Steve Stanek

[MinuteGal]

I'm 1500 miles away and I can hear the Fed's shredders going as I type.

This document dump might be better than Wickileaks......are you listening, Barney.....?

To be sure, the Fed can still file an appeal with our country's new controlling authority, the U.N., now that it gave permission for Obama to invade Libya in spite of the Constitution.

Leni

[Stayfree]

Every reference to a word that starts with “G” or”s” will be redacted of course.

[Jet Jaguar]

BTTT

[esoxmagnum]

Obama will do just like DOMA and tell the SC to butt out.

There is no separation of powers under this administration.

They will ignore the ruling, and the media will ignore the story.

[OneWingedShark]

>Every reference to a word that starts with “G” or”s” will be redacted of course.

I doubt there are many occurrences of “God” or “satan,” though there might be a few to “Gold standard.”
;)

{Yes, I know you meant Goldman-Sachs.}

[Gaffer]

They won't release anything. What makes anyone think that if Obama and Holder are busily implementing Obamacare in the face of a FEDERAL COURT ORDER declaring it unconstitutional in its ENTIRETY, that they will deign to accept this SC denial to review as anything more important?

What we have are Muslim radicals in charge of this goverment, and if it ain't 'Sharia', it ain't shit.

[OneWingedShark]

Of possible interest to your ping lists.

[Ghost of Philip Marlowe]

Great idea. I wish they would.

[logician2u]

Pinging you for the list.