Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker

“Palin’s negatives are way too high. She would likely lose to Barry. We can’t afford to nominate another weak candidate and let that train wreck of a president get another term.”
__________

Reagan’s negatives are way too high. He would likely lose to Mondale. We can’t afford to nominate another weak candidate and let that train wreck of a Senator become president.


83 posted on 03/23/2011 10:22:15 AM PDT by Josh Painter ("The only thing these 'investments' will get us is a bullet train to bankruptcy." - Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Josh Painter
Sarah Palin is not Ronald Reagan. RR was a military veteran and headed a major union when it fended off an attack by the communists. He studied history and political economy for a decade on General Electric's dime. He was a two-term Governor of our largest state. He was very well prepared for the Presidency.

Sarah Palin was Mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, and only served two years of a term as Governor of one of our smallest states. She had trouble with basic questions in media interviews as a VP candidate.

Personally, I love her. I agree with her on just about all issues. She's a breath of fresh air in the media. But she's not qualified and wouldn't win.

People loath Obama? Yep, but they need a credible alternative. Don't believe me? Republicans ran the table in Colorado in statewide races and winnable Congressional races, but lost Senate and Governor because of weak candidates.

113 posted on 03/23/2011 10:40:03 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson